Between minimal and greater than minimal risk: how research participants and oncologists assess data-sharing and the risk of re-identification in genomic research

Data-sharing among genomic researchers is promoted for its potential to accelerate our understanding of the molecular basis of cancer. However, with genomic data sharing the risks of re-identifying study participants, revealing personal genomic information and data misuse might increase. This study...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Schleidgen, Sebastian (Author) , Husedzinovic, Alma (Author) , Ose, Dominik (Author) , Schickhardt, Christoph (Author) , Kalle, Christof von (Author) , Winkler, Eva C. (Author)
Format: Article (Journal)
Language:English
Published: [2019]
In: Philosophy & technology
Year: 2019, Volume: 32, Issue: 1, Pages: 39-55
ISSN:2210-5441
DOI:10.1007/s13347-017-0268-0
Online Access:Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-017-0268-0
Get full text
Author Notes:Sebastian Schleidgen, Alma Husedzinovic, Dominik Ose, Christoph Schickhardt, Christof von Kalle, Eva C. Winkler
Description
Summary:Data-sharing among genomic researchers is promoted for its potential to accelerate our understanding of the molecular basis of cancer. However, with genomic data sharing the risks of re-identifying study participants, revealing personal genomic information and data misuse might increase. This study aims at exploring perceptions of patients and physicians in Oncology regarding their assessment of the informational risks resulting from participating in whole genomic research studies in order to improve the informed consent process. For this purpose, we conducted a qualitative focus group study at the National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT). Patients and oncologists assessed the informational risks either as minimal or as greater than minimal, depending on the context factors of occupational status, age, and patients’ prognosis. Interestingly, even patients who assumed a greater risk did not refrain from participating in genomic research, provided that certain informational and institutional safeguards are implemented. Moreover, they expected comprehensive disclosure of the risks resulting from genomic data sharing. These results suggest (1) comprehensive disclosure of the risks of genomic research to potential study participants in genomic research to facilitate risk assessment and sound decision making, (2) establishing independent governance entities in order to minimize the informational risks of genomic research, and (3) implementing data sharing policies which offer guidance for physicians and researchers involved in genomic research.
Item Description:Published online: 5 June 2017
Gesehen am 23.04.2021
Physical Description:Online Resource
ISSN:2210-5441
DOI:10.1007/s13347-017-0268-0