Die deutschsprachige Forschung zur Transformation politischer Systeme in Asien: Perspektiven, Profile und Befunde
German scholars have long neglected the analysis of political transformation pro-cesses in South, Southeast, and Northeast Asia. Only since the end of the 1990s have researchers in Germany developed an interest in this international, mostly English-language, literature. In contrast, German-language...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Dokumenttyp: | Article (Journal) |
| Sprache: | Deutsch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Juli 2017
|
| In: |
Asien
Year: 2017, Jahrgang: 144, Pages: 135-151 |
| ISSN: | 2701-8431 |
| DOI: | 10.11588/asien.2017.144.14781 |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext kostenfrei 
|
| Verfasserangaben: | Aurel Croissant |
| Zusammenfassung: | German scholars have long neglected the analysis of political transformation pro-cesses in South, Southeast, and Northeast Asia. Only since the end of the 1990s have researchers in Germany developed an interest in this international, mostly English-language, literature. In contrast, German-language political science democ-ratization research on Asia has long been well established. As in North America, the boundaries between democratization and autocracy research have become blurred in recent years — while the close link between democracy and dictatorship research is a welcome development. Theoretically and methodologically, the German-language transformation research on Asia has made only a comparatively small contribution to international political science research. Its main advance has been in its in-depth analysis of individual or select cases. In order to remain internationally pertinent and to become more widely accepted, German-language research hence-forth needs to be more methodologically nuanced as well as to embrace the triangulation of data and mixed-methods research designs. (Asien/GIGA) |
|---|---|
| Beschreibung: | Online Resource |
| ISSN: | 2701-8431 |
| DOI: | 10.11588/asien.2017.144.14781 |