ENERgized vessel sealing systems versus CONventional hemostasis techniques in thyroid surgery: the ENERCON systematic review and network meta-analysis
Energized vessel-sealing systems have been proposed to save operation time and reduce post-operative complications. The aim of the present systematic review was to compare operation time and postoperative morbidity for ultrasonic and electrothermal bipolar-activated devices with conventional hemosta...
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Dokumenttyp: | Article (Journal) |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
16 November 2013
|
| In: |
Langenbeck's archives of surgery
Year: 2013, Jahrgang: 398, Heft: 8, Pages: 1039-1056 |
| ISSN: | 1435-2451 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s00423-013-1137-7 |
| Online-Zugang: | Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-013-1137-7 |
| Verfasserangaben: | Pietro Contin, Käthe Gooßen, Kathrin Grummich, Katrin Jensen, Hubertus Schmitz-Winnenthal, Markus W. Büchler, Markus K. Diener |
| Zusammenfassung: | Energized vessel-sealing systems have been proposed to save operation time and reduce post-operative complications. The aim of the present systematic review was to compare operation time and postoperative morbidity for ultrasonic and electrothermal bipolar-activated devices with conventional hemostasis techniques and with each other in open thyroidectomy. |
|---|---|
| Beschreibung: | Gesehen am 11.05.2021 |
| Beschreibung: | Online Resource |
| ISSN: | 1435-2451 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s00423-013-1137-7 |