ENERgized vessel sealing systems versus CONventional hemostasis techniques in thyroid surgery: the ENERCON systematic review and network meta-analysis

Energized vessel-sealing systems have been proposed to save operation time and reduce post-operative complications. The aim of the present systematic review was to compare operation time and postoperative morbidity for ultrasonic and electrothermal bipolar-activated devices with conventional hemosta...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Contin, Pietro (Author) , Goossen, Käthe (Author) , Grummich, Kathrin (Author) , Jensen, Katrin (Author) , Schmitz-Winnenthal, Friedrich Hubertus (Author) , Büchler, Markus W. (Author) , Diener, Markus K. (Author)
Format: Article (Journal)
Language:English
Published: 16 November 2013
In: Langenbeck's archives of surgery
Year: 2013, Volume: 398, Issue: 8, Pages: 1039-1056
ISSN:1435-2451
DOI:10.1007/s00423-013-1137-7
Online Access:Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-013-1137-7
Get full text
Author Notes:Pietro Contin, Käthe Gooßen, Kathrin Grummich, Katrin Jensen, Hubertus Schmitz-Winnenthal, Markus W. Büchler, Markus K. Diener
Description
Summary:Energized vessel-sealing systems have been proposed to save operation time and reduce post-operative complications. The aim of the present systematic review was to compare operation time and postoperative morbidity for ultrasonic and electrothermal bipolar-activated devices with conventional hemostasis techniques and with each other in open thyroidectomy.
Item Description:Gesehen am 11.05.2021
Physical Description:Online Resource
ISSN:1435-2451
DOI:10.1007/s00423-013-1137-7