ENERgized vessel sealing systems versus CONventional hemostasis techniques in thyroid surgery: the ENERCON systematic review and network meta-analysis

Energized vessel-sealing systems have been proposed to save operation time and reduce post-operative complications. The aim of the present systematic review was to compare operation time and postoperative morbidity for ultrasonic and electrothermal bipolar-activated devices with conventional hemosta...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Contin, Pietro (VerfasserIn) , Goossen, Käthe (VerfasserIn) , Grummich, Kathrin (VerfasserIn) , Jensen, Katrin (VerfasserIn) , Schmitz-Winnenthal, Friedrich Hubertus (VerfasserIn) , Büchler, Markus W. (VerfasserIn) , Diener, Markus K. (VerfasserIn)
Dokumenttyp: Article (Journal)
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 16 November 2013
In: Langenbeck's archives of surgery
Year: 2013, Jahrgang: 398, Heft: 8, Pages: 1039-1056
ISSN:1435-2451
DOI:10.1007/s00423-013-1137-7
Online-Zugang:Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-013-1137-7
Volltext
Verfasserangaben:Pietro Contin, Käthe Gooßen, Kathrin Grummich, Katrin Jensen, Hubertus Schmitz-Winnenthal, Markus W. Büchler, Markus K. Diener
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Energized vessel-sealing systems have been proposed to save operation time and reduce post-operative complications. The aim of the present systematic review was to compare operation time and postoperative morbidity for ultrasonic and electrothermal bipolar-activated devices with conventional hemostasis techniques and with each other in open thyroidectomy.
Beschreibung:Gesehen am 11.05.2021
Beschreibung:Online Resource
ISSN:1435-2451
DOI:10.1007/s00423-013-1137-7