Evaluation of research ethics committees: criteria for the ethical quality of the review process
Repeatedly, adequacy, performance and quality of Ethics Committees that oversee medical research trials are being discussed. Although they play a crucial role in reviewing medical research and protecting human subjects, it is far from clear to what degree they fulfill the task they have been assigne...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article (Journal) |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
23 Jan 2017
|
| In: |
Accountability in research
Year: 2017, Volume: 24, Issue: 3, Pages: 152-176 |
| ISSN: | 1545-5815 |
| DOI: | 10.1080/08989621.2016.1273778 |
| Online Access: | Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2016.1273778
|
| Author Notes: | Gregor Scherzinger, Monika Bobbert |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 175772754X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220819203840.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 210512s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/08989621.2016.1273778 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)175772754X | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP175772754X | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1341409079 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 33 |2 sdnb | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Scherzinger, Gregor |d 1982- |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1059084104 |0 (DE-627)797945806 |0 (DE-576)41510436X |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Evaluation of research ethics committees |b criteria for the ethical quality of the review process |c Gregor Scherzinger, Monika Bobbert |
| 264 | 1 | |c 23 Jan 2017 | |
| 300 | |a 25 | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Gesehen am 12.05.2021 | ||
| 520 | |a Repeatedly, adequacy, performance and quality of Ethics Committees that oversee medical research trials are being discussed. Although they play a crucial role in reviewing medical research and protecting human subjects, it is far from clear to what degree they fulfill the task they have been assigned to. This eventuates in the call for an evaluation of their activity and, in some places, led to the establishment of accreditation schemes. At the same time, IRBs have become subject of detailed legislation in the process of the ongoing global juridification of medical research. Unsurprisingly, there is a tendency to understand the evaluation of RECs as a question of controlling their legal compliance. This paper discusses the need for a quality evaluation of IRBs from an ethical point of view and, by systematically reviewing the major ethical guidelines for IRBs, proposes a system of criteria that should orientate any evaluation of IRBs. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Biomedical Research | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Clinical research ethics; ethical deliberation; human subject protection; independent review boards; quality evaluation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Ethics Committees, Research | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Ethics, Research | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Humans | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Bobbert, Monika |d 1963- |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)101980209X |0 (DE-627)687016142 |0 (DE-576)183713060 |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Accountability in research |d London [u.a.] : Taylor and Francis, 1989 |g 24(2017), 3, Seite 152-176 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)341895938 |w (DE-600)2069334-5 |w (DE-576)099604159 |x 1545-5815 |7 nnas |a Evaluation of research ethics committees criteria for the ethical quality of the review process |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:24 |g year:2017 |g number:3 |g pages:152-176 |g extent:25 |a Evaluation of research ethics committees criteria for the ethical quality of the review process |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2016.1273778 |x Verlag |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 992 | |a 20210512 | ||
| 993 | |a Article | ||
| 994 | |a 2017 | ||
| 998 | |g 101980209X |a Bobbert, Monika |m 101980209X:Bobbert, Monika |p 2 |y j | ||
| 999 | |a KXP-PPN175772754X |e 3927668273 | ||
| BIB | |a Y | ||
| SER | |a journal | ||
| JSO | |a {"id":{"doi":["10.1080/08989621.2016.1273778"],"eki":["175772754X"]},"origin":[{"dateIssuedKey":"2017","dateIssuedDisp":"23 Jan 2017"}],"name":{"displayForm":["Gregor Scherzinger, Monika Bobbert"]},"recId":"175772754X","person":[{"display":"Scherzinger, Gregor","given":"Gregor","role":"aut","family":"Scherzinger"},{"display":"Bobbert, Monika","given":"Monika","role":"aut","family":"Bobbert"}],"title":[{"title":"Evaluation of research ethics committees","subtitle":"criteria for the ethical quality of the review process","title_sort":"Evaluation of research ethics committees"}],"language":["eng"],"physDesc":[{"extent":"25 S."}],"type":{"bibl":"article-journal","media":"Online-Ressource"},"relHost":[{"language":["eng"],"pubHistory":["1.1989/91 -"],"physDesc":[{"extent":"Online-Ressource"}],"type":{"media":"Online-Ressource","bibl":"periodical"},"note":["Gesehen am 04.07.11"],"title":[{"title_sort":"Accountability in research","title":"Accountability in research","subtitle":"policies and quality assurance"}],"disp":"Evaluation of research ethics committees criteria for the ethical quality of the review processAccountability in research","recId":"341895938","part":{"text":"24(2017), 3, Seite 152-176","extent":"25","volume":"24","pages":"152-176","issue":"3","year":"2017"},"id":{"eki":["341895938"],"issn":["1545-5815"],"zdb":["2069334-5"]},"origin":[{"dateIssuedDisp":"1989-","publisher":"Taylor and Francis","dateIssuedKey":"1989","publisherPlace":"London [u.a.]"}]}],"note":["Gesehen am 12.05.2021"]} | ||
| SRT | |a SCHERZINGEEVALUATION2320 | ||