APA (7th ed.) Citation

Guedeney, P., Thiele, H., Kerneis, M., Barthelemy, O., Baumann, S., Sandri, M., . . . Akın, I. (2020). Radial versus femoral artery access for percutaneous coronary artery intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction and multivessel disease complicated by cardiogenic shock: Subanalysis from the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial. American heart journal, 225, . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2020.04.014

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

Guedeney, Paul, et al. "Radial Versus Femoral Artery Access for Percutaneous Coronary Artery Intervention in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: Subanalysis from the CULPRIT-SHOCK Trial." American Heart Journal 225 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2020.04.014.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

Guedeney, Paul, et al. "Radial Versus Femoral Artery Access for Percutaneous Coronary Artery Intervention in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: Subanalysis from the CULPRIT-SHOCK Trial." American Heart Journal, vol. 225, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2020.04.014.