Gemcitabine and docetaxel for metastatic soft tissue sarcoma: a single center experience

Background: Prognosis and survival for patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS) are dismal. Standard first-line systemic chemotherapy is anthracycline-based. Gemcitabine/docetaxel (GD) is a therapeutic option in the second-line setting. Here we present the data of our single center retrosp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Schmitt, Thomas (Author) , Kosely, Florentina (Author) , Wuchter, Patrick (Author) , Schmier, Johann-Wilhelm Adam (Author) , Ho, Anthony Dick (Author) , Egerer, Gerlinde (Author)
Format: Article (Journal)
Language:English
Published: July 8, 2013
In: Onkologie
Year: 2013, Volume: 36, Issue: 7/8, Pages: 415-420
ISSN:1423-0240
DOI:10.1159/000353564
Online Access:Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1159/000353564
Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/353564
Get full text
Author Notes:Thomas Schmitt, Florentina Kosely, Patrick Wuchter, Johann-Wilhelm Schmier, Anthony D. Ho, Gerlinde Egerer
Description
Summary:Background: Prognosis and survival for patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS) are dismal. Standard first-line systemic chemotherapy is anthracycline-based. Gemcitabine/docetaxel (GD) is a therapeutic option in the second-line setting. Here we present the data of our single center retrospective analysis, using GD in locally advanced or metastatic disease. Patients and Methods: Between 2005 and 2012, a total of 34 patients were identified. The majority of tumors were located in the extremities (19/34, 56%) and abdomen/retroperitoneum (10/34, 29%). Most frequent histologies included leiomyosarcoma (13/34, 38%), liposarcoma (7/34, 21%), and pleomorphic sarcoma (6/34, 18%). Results: Objective response to treatment by RECIST criteria after 3 cycles was low with 6% partial responses (PR, 2/34), 65% stable disease (SD, 22/34), and 29% progressive disease (PD, 10/34). Progression-free survival at 3 and 6 months was 77 and 62%, respectively. Patients with a clinical benefit (defined as PR or SD after the 3rd treatment cycle) had a significantly prolonged median progression-free and overall survival with 8.6 months (p < 0.0001; hazard ratio (HR) 33.1) and 22.4 months (p < 0.0001; HR 12.9), respectively. Most common toxicities included hand-foot syndrome, edema, pancytopenia, febrile neutropenia, and mucositis. Conclusion: Overall, we conclude that GD is an active second-line regimen in metastatic STS, with manageable side effects.
Item Description:Gesehen am 08.07.2021
Physical Description:Online Resource
ISSN:1423-0240
DOI:10.1159/000353564