The role of the observer in the Everett interpretation
The role attributed to the observer in various interpretations of quantum mechanics as well as in classical statistical mechanics is discussed, with particular attention being paid to the Everett interpretation. In this context, the important difference between “quasi-classical†(robust against...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article (Journal) |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2013
|
| In: |
Neuroquantology
Year: 2013, Volume: 11, Issue: 1, Pages: 97-105 |
| ISSN: | 1303-5150 |
| DOI: | 10.14704/nq.2013.11.1.645 |
| Online Access: | Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.14704/nq.2013.11.1.645 Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: http://www.neuroquantology.com/article.php?id=2157 
|
| Author Notes: | H. Dieter Zeh |
| Summary: | The role attributed to the observer in various interpretations of quantum mechanics as well as in classical statistical mechanics is discussed, with particular attention being paid to the Everett interpretation. In this context, the important difference between “quasi-classical†(robust against decoherence) and “macroscopic†or “physically given†(redundantly documented in the environment) is pointed out. |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | Gesehen am 27.07.2021 |
| Physical Description: | Online Resource |
| ISSN: | 1303-5150 |
| DOI: | 10.14704/nq.2013.11.1.645 |