Reclaiming constructivism: towards an interpretive reading of the ‘Social construction framework’

The ‘Social Construction Framework’ which addresses the relationship between policy design and the construction of target groups is one of the central approaches within the field of policy theories. Yet, despite its name, the approach builds on several naturalist premises, and its analytical compone...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Barbehön, Marlon (VerfasserIn)
Dokumenttyp: Article (Journal)
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 4 February 2020
In: Policy sciences
Year: 2020, Jahrgang: 53, Heft: 1, Pages: 139-160
ISSN:1573-0891
DOI:10.1007/s11077-020-09370-7
Online-Zugang:Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-020-09370-7
Volltext
Verfasserangaben:Marlon Barbehön

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a2200000 c 4500
001 1768331588
003 DE-627
005 20220208231124.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 210901s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s11077-020-09370-7  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1768331588 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1768331588 
035 |a (OCoLC)1295680275 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 16  |2 sdnb 
100 1 |a Barbehön, Marlon  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1031393811  |0 (DE-627)736349022  |0 (DE-576)378837451  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Reclaiming constructivism  |b towards an interpretive reading of the ‘Social construction framework’  |c Marlon Barbehön 
264 1 |c 4 February 2020 
300 |a 22 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Gesehen am 01.09.2021 
520 |a The ‘Social Construction Framework’ which addresses the relationship between policy design and the construction of target groups is one of the central approaches within the field of policy theories. Yet, despite its name, the approach builds on several naturalist premises, and its analytical components are informed by principles rooted in positivist methodologies. Against this background, this article conducts a thorough critique of the framework’s constructivist shortcomings, and it develops a strictly constructivist and interpretive reading of its core arguments. The analytical value is substantiated by presenting original empirical research on the meaning of the ‘middle class’ in German welfare policy. We will show that, firstly, group construction is not only a matter of positive or negative evaluation, but more fundamentally an act of boundary-drawing, with differently constructed middle classes enabling different welfare policies. Secondly, we will show that target group constructions are always entangled with the construction of the group’s outside, leading to the stabilisation and legitimisation of hierarchies between the middle class and ‘the others’ in society. Thirdly, we demonstrate that the power of a target group is also a matter of social construction, with the middle class obtaining its hegemonic position from an order of knowledge that equates the middle with ‘the normal’ and ‘the common good’. Based on these insights, the article raises a more general plea against the translation of constructivism into a middle-range theory of the policy process and instead emphasises the ontological and epistemological distinctiveness of strict constructivism and interpretive methodologies. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Policy sciences  |d New York : Springer Science+Business Media LLC, 1970  |g 53(2020), 1, Seite 139-160  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320588734  |w (DE-600)2018631-9  |w (DE-576)102669430  |x 1573-0891  |7 nnas  |a Reclaiming constructivism towards an interpretive reading of the ‘Social construction framework’ 
773 1 8 |g volume:53  |g year:2020  |g number:1  |g pages:139-160  |g extent:22  |a Reclaiming constructivism towards an interpretive reading of the ‘Social construction framework’ 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-020-09370-7  |x Verlag  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
992 |a 20210901 
993 |a Article 
994 |a 2020 
998 |g 1031393811  |a Barbehön, Marlon  |m 1031393811:Barbehön, Marlon  |d 180000  |d 180500  |e 180000PB1031393811  |e 180500PB1031393811  |k 0/180000/  |k 1/180000/180500/  |p 1  |x j  |y j 
999 |a KXP-PPN1768331588  |e 397233074X 
BIB |a Y 
SER |a journal 
JSO |a {"origin":[{"dateIssuedDisp":"4 February 2020","dateIssuedKey":"2020"}],"note":["Gesehen am 01.09.2021"],"relHost":[{"language":["eng"],"id":{"eki":["320588734"],"zdb":["2018631-9"],"issn":["1573-0891"]},"pubHistory":["1.1970 -"],"note":["Gesehen am 07.12.23"],"origin":[{"publisherPlace":"New York ; New York ; Dordrecht ; Dordrecht","dateIssuedDisp":"1970-","publisher":"Springer Science+Business Media LLC ; Elsevier ; Kluwer Acad. Publ. ; Springer Science + Business Media B.V.","dateIssuedKey":"1970"}],"recId":"320588734","type":{"media":"Online-Ressource","bibl":"periodical"},"disp":"Reclaiming constructivism towards an interpretive reading of the ‘Social construction framework’Policy sciences","physDesc":[{"extent":"Online-Ressource"}],"title":[{"subtitle":"integrating knowledge and practice to advance human dignity : the journal of the Society of Policy Scientists","title":"Policy sciences","title_sort":"Policy sciences"}],"part":{"extent":"22","volume":"53","issue":"1","pages":"139-160","year":"2020","text":"53(2020), 1, Seite 139-160"},"titleAlt":[{"title":"An international journal for the policy sciences"},{"title":"An international journal devoted to the improvement of policy making"}]}],"recId":"1768331588","type":{"bibl":"article-journal","media":"Online-Ressource"},"language":["eng"],"name":{"displayForm":["Marlon Barbehön"]},"id":{"doi":["10.1007/s11077-020-09370-7"],"eki":["1768331588"]},"physDesc":[{"extent":"22 S."}],"person":[{"family":"Barbehön","display":"Barbehön, Marlon","given":"Marlon","role":"aut"}],"title":[{"title_sort":"Reclaiming constructivism","subtitle":"towards an interpretive reading of the ‘Social construction framework’","title":"Reclaiming constructivism"}]} 
SRT |a BARBEHOENMRECLAIMING4202