Buchumschlag

Meta-analysis of primary open versus closed cannulation strategy for totally implantable venous access port implantation

There is still no reference standard for the implantation of totally implantable venous access ports (TIVAPs). A recently published multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) revealed a significantly greater risk of pneumothorax after closed cannulation than after an open strategy. The aim of thi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Klaiber, Ulla (VerfasserIn) , Probst, Pascal (VerfasserIn) , Hackbusch, Matthes (VerfasserIn) , Jensen, Katrin (VerfasserIn) , Dörr-Harim, Colette (VerfasserIn) , Hüttner, Felix (VerfasserIn) , Hackert, Thilo (VerfasserIn) , Diener, Markus K. (VerfasserIn) , Büchler, Markus W. (VerfasserIn) , Knebel, Phillip (VerfasserIn)
Dokumenttyp: Article (Journal)
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 9 January 2021
In: Langenbeck's archives of surgery
Year: 2021, Jahrgang: 406, Heft: 3, Pages: 587-596
ISSN:1435-2451
DOI:10.1007/s00423-020-02057-w
Online-Zugang:Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-020-02057-w
Volltext
Verfasserangaben:Ulla Klaiber, Pascal Probst, Matthes Hackbusch, Katrin Jensen, Colette Dörr-Harim, Felix J. Hüttner, Thilo Hackert, Markus K. Diener, Markus W. Büchler, Phillip Knebel
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:There is still no reference standard for the implantation of totally implantable venous access ports (TIVAPs). A recently published multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) revealed a significantly greater risk of pneumothorax after closed cannulation than after an open strategy. The aim of this meta-analysis was to provide an update of the available evidence for the safety and effectiveness of primary open versus closed cannulation strategy.
Beschreibung:Gesehen am 14.10.2021
Beschreibung:Online Resource
ISSN:1435-2451
DOI:10.1007/s00423-020-02057-w

Ähnliche Einträge