Decision-making with partial information

In this paper, we study choice under uncertainty with belief functions. Belief functions can capture partial information by describing what is objectively known about the probabilities of events. State-contingent acts together with a belief function over states induce belief functions over outcomes....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Eichberger, Jürgen (VerfasserIn) , Pasichnichenko, Illia (VerfasserIn)
Dokumenttyp: Article (Journal)
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 18 October 2021
In: Journal of economic theory
Year: 2021, Jahrgang: 198, Pages: 1-33
DOI:10.1016/j.jet.2021.105369
Online-Zugang:Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2021.105369
Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022053121001861
Volltext
Verfasserangaben:Jürgen Eichberger, Illia Pasichnichenko
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In this paper, we study choice under uncertainty with belief functions. Belief functions can capture partial information by describing what is objectively known about the probabilities of events. State-contingent acts together with a belief function over states induce belief functions over outcomes. We assume that decision makers have preferences over belief functions that reflect both their valuation of outcomes and the information available about the likelihood of outcomes. We provide axioms characterizing a preference representation for belief functions that captures what is (objectively) known about the likelihood of outcomes and combines it with subjective beliefs according to the “principle of insufficient reason” whenever the likelihood of events is unknown. This treatment of partial information yields a natural distinction between ambiguity and ambiguity attitudes. The approach is novel in its treatment of partial information and in its axiomatization of the uniform distribution in case of ignorance.
Beschreibung:Gesehen am 06.12.2021
Beschreibung:Online Resource
DOI:10.1016/j.jet.2021.105369