Judges' freedom of expression and their independence: an ambivalent relationship
Whereas judges have traditionally exercised restraint in public pronouncements, there is an increasing expectation nowadays that they explain their decision-making to the broader public. On the other hand, public pronouncement of personal views may give rise to concerns about a judge’s impartiality...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Dokumenttyp: | Kapitel/Artikel Konferenzschrift |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2021
|
| In: |
The Rule of Law in Europe
Year: 2021, Pages: 89-110 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/978-3-030-56001-0_7 |
| Online-Zugang: | Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56001-0_7 |
| Verfasserangaben: | Anja Seibert-Fohr |
Search Result 1
Judges' freedom of expression and their independence: an ambivalent relationship
Kapitel/Artikel
Konferenzschrift