Serial ANCA determinations for monitoring disease activity in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis: systematic review

BACKGROUND: Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCAs) are considered by some investigators to be sensitive markers of disease activity and have been suggested to predict relapse and guide therapeutic decisions. Studies using serial ANCA monitoring in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAS...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Birck, Rainer (VerfasserIn) , Schmitt, Wilhelm (VerfasserIn) , Kälsch, Anna-Isabelle (VerfasserIn) , Woude, Fokko J. van der (VerfasserIn)
Dokumenttyp: Article (Journal)
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2006
In: American journal of kidney diseases
Year: 2006, Jahrgang: 47, Heft: 1, Pages: 15-23
ISSN:1523-6838
DOI:10.1053/j.ajkd.2005.09.022
Online-Zugang:Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2005.09.022
Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272638605014939
Volltext
Verfasserangaben:Rainer Birck, Wilhelm H. Schmitt, Isabelle A. Kaelsch, and Fokko J. van der Woude
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BACKGROUND: Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCAs) are considered by some investigators to be sensitive markers of disease activity and have been suggested to predict relapse and guide therapeutic decisions. Studies using serial ANCA monitoring in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis (AASV) have yielded controversial results during the last 15 years. To assess the diagnostic value of serial ANCA testing in the follow-up of patients with AASV, we conducted a systematic review of the available literature. METHODS: Studies were identified by a comprehensive search of the PubMed and BIOSIS+/RRM databases, as well as hand searching. Method quality of all eligible studies was assessed with respect to external and internal validity according to established criteria for diagnostic studies. RESULTS: Twenty-two studies met our inclusion criteria, including a total of 950 patients. Whereas generalizability was not a major problem, assessment of internal validity showed that only a minority of studies reported the combination of consecutive patient recruitment, prospective data collection, and independent determination of both index and reference tests, considered as the ideal for diagnostic test studies. Quantitative meta-analytic calculations were not conducted because of the presence of considerable method heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: The presence of considerable methodological heterogeneity combined with methodological shortcomings with respect to internal validity in the majority of included studies preclude firm conclusions from the available literature concerning the clinical value of serial ANCA determinations for monitoring the follow-up of patients with AASV.
Beschreibung:Elektronische Reproduktion der Druckausgabe, 21 February 2008
Gesehen am 26.04.2022
Beschreibung:Online Resource
ISSN:1523-6838
DOI:10.1053/j.ajkd.2005.09.022