Comment on "Casimir force in the O(n→∞) model with free boundary conditions"
In a recent paper by D. Dantchev, J. Bergknoff, and J. Rudnick [Phys. Rev. E 89, 042116 (2014)], the problem of the Casimir force in the O(n) model on a slab with free boundary conditions, investigated earlier by us [Europhys. Lett. 100, 10004 (2012)], is reconsidered using a mean-spherical model wi...
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Dokumenttyp: | Article (Journal) |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
17 February 2015
|
| In: |
Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics
Year: 2015, Jahrgang: 91, Heft: 2, Pages: 1-3 |
| ISSN: | 1550-2376 |
| DOI: | 10.1103/PhysRevE.91.026101 |
| Online-Zugang: | Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.91.026101 Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.91.026101 
|
| Verfasserangaben: | H.W. Diehl, Daniel Grüneberg, Martin Hasenbusch, Alfred Hucht, Sergei B. Rutkevich, and Felix M. Schmidt |
| Zusammenfassung: | In a recent paper by D. Dantchev, J. Bergknoff, and J. Rudnick [Phys. Rev. E 89, 042116 (2014)], the problem of the Casimir force in the O(n) model on a slab with free boundary conditions, investigated earlier by us [Europhys. Lett. 100, 10004 (2012)], is reconsidered using a mean-spherical model with separate constraints for each layer. The authors (i) question the applicability of the Ginzburg-Landau-Wilson approach to the low-temperature regime, arguing for the superiority of their model compared to the family of ϕ4 models A and B whose numerically exact solutions we determined both for values of the coupling constant 0<g<∞ and for g=∞. They (ii) report consistency of their results with ours in the critical region and a strong manifestation of universality but (iii) point out discrepancies with our results in the region below Tc. Here we refute (i) and prove that our model B with g=∞ is identical to their spherical model. Hence evidence for the reported universality is already contained in our paper. Moreover, the results we determined for anyone of the models A and B for various thicknesses L are all numerically exact. (iii) is due to their misinterpretation of our results for the scaling limit. We also show that their low-temperature expansion, which does not hold inside the scaling regime, is limited to temperatures lower than they anticipated. |
|---|---|
| Beschreibung: | Gesehen am 14.09.2022 |
| Beschreibung: | Online Resource |
| ISSN: | 1550-2376 |
| DOI: | 10.1103/PhysRevE.91.026101 |