Assessment of physical activity in older people with and without cognitive impairment

The purpose of this study was to validate a new interview-administered physical activity questionnaire (Assessment of Physical Activity in Frail Older People; APAFOP) in older people with and without cognitive impairment. The authors assessed feasibility, validity, and test-retest reliability in 168...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Hauer, Klaus (VerfasserIn) , Lord, Stephen R. (VerfasserIn) , Lindemann, Ulrich (VerfasserIn) , Lamb, Sarah E. (VerfasserIn) , Aminian, Kamiar (VerfasserIn) , Schwenk, Michael (VerfasserIn)
Dokumenttyp: Article (Journal)
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: [2011]
In: Journal of aging and physical activity
Year: 2011, Jahrgang: 19, Heft: 4, Pages: 347-372
ISSN:1543-267X
DOI:10.1123/japa.19.4.347
Online-Zugang:Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1123/japa.19.4.347
Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://journals.humankinetics.com/view/journals/japa/19/4/article-p347.xml
Volltext
Verfasserangaben:Klaus Hauer, Stephen R. Lord, Ulrich Lindemann, Sarah E. Lamb, Kamiar Aminian, and Michael Schwenk
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The purpose of this study was to validate a new interview-administered physical activity questionnaire (Assessment of Physical Activity in Frail Older People; APAFOP) in older people with and without cognitive impairment. The authors assessed feasibility, validity, and test-retest reliability in 168 people (n = 78 with, n = 88 without cognitive impairment). Concurrent validity was assessed against an inertia-based motion sensor and an established questionnaire. Sensitivity to change was tested in an ongoing study in patients with mild to moderate dementia (n = 81). Assessment of physical activity by the APAFOP and the motion sensor correlated well in the total sample (TS; p = .705), as well as in the subsamples with cognitive impairment (CI; p = .585) and without CI (p = .787). Excellent feasibility with an acceptance rate of 100%, test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients ranging from .973 (TS) to .975 (CI) to .966 (no CI), and sensitivity to change (effect sizes: 0.35-1.47) were found in both subsamples.
Beschreibung:Gesehen am 07.09.2022
Beschreibung:Online Resource
ISSN:1543-267X
DOI:10.1123/japa.19.4.347