Microsurgical reconstruction of the head and neck: current practice of maxillofacial units in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland

Refinement in microvascular reconstructive techniques over the last 30 years has enabled an increasing number of patients to be rehabilitated for both functional and aesthetic reasons. The purpose of this study was to evaluate different microsurgical practice, including perioperative management, in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Mücke, Thomas (VerfasserIn) , Müller, Andreas Albert (VerfasserIn) , Kansy, Julia Katharina (VerfasserIn) , Hallermann, Wock (VerfasserIn) , Kerkmann, Heiko (VerfasserIn) , Schuck, Nils (VerfasserIn) , Zeilhofer, Hans-Florian (VerfasserIn) , Hoffmann, Jürgen (VerfasserIn) , Hölzle, Frank (VerfasserIn)
Körperschaft: Deutsch-Österreichisch-Schweizerischer Arbeitskreis für Tumoren im Kiefer-Gesichtsbereich (VerfasserIn)
Dokumenttyp: Article (Journal)
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2011
In: Journal of cranio-maxillofacial surgery
Year: 2011, Jahrgang: 39, Heft: 6, Pages: 449-452
ISSN:1878-4119
DOI:10.1016/j.jcms.2010.10.019
Online-Zugang:Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2010.10.019
Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1010518210002088
Volltext
Verfasserangaben:Thomas Mücke, Andreas Albert Müller, Katinka Kansy, Wock Hallermann, Heiko Kerkmann, Nils Schuck, Hans-Florian Zeilhofer, Jürgen Hoffmann, Frank Hölzle, DÖSAK collaborative group for Microsurgical Reconstruction
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Refinement in microvascular reconstructive techniques over the last 30 years has enabled an increasing number of patients to be rehabilitated for both functional and aesthetic reasons. The purpose of this study was to evaluate different microsurgical practice, including perioperative management, in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. The DÖSAK collaborative group for Microsurgical Reconstruction developed a detailed questionnaire which was circulated to units in the three countries. The current practice of the departments was evaluated. Thirty-eight questionnaires were completed resulting in a 47.5% response rate. A considerable variation in the number of microsurgical reconstructions per year was noted. In relation to the timing of bony reconstruction, 10 hospitals did reconstructions primarily (26.3%), 19 secondarily (50%) and 9 (23.7%) hospitals used both concepts. In the postoperative course, 15.8% of hospitals use inhibitors of platelet aggregation, most hospitals use low molecular heparin (52.6%) or other heparin products (44.7%). This survey shows variation in the performance, management, and care of microsurgical reconstructions of patients. This is due in part to the microvascular surgeons available in the unit but it is also due to different types of hospitals where various types of care can be performed in these patients needing special perioperative care.
Beschreibung:First published online: 26 November 2010
Gesehen am 08.09.2022
Beschreibung:Online Resource
ISSN:1878-4119
DOI:10.1016/j.jcms.2010.10.019