Clinical trial end points for high-grade glioma: the evolving landscape

To review the strengths and weaknesses of primary and auxiliary end points for clinical trials among patients with high-grade glioma (HGG). Recent advances in outcome for patients with newly diagnosed and recurrent HGG, coupled with the development of multiple promising therapeutics with myriad anti...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Reardon, David A. (VerfasserIn) , Galanis, Evanthia (VerfasserIn) , DeGroot, John F. (VerfasserIn) , Cloughesy, Timothy F. (VerfasserIn) , Wefel, Jeffrey S. (VerfasserIn) , Lamborn, Kathleen R. (VerfasserIn) , Lassman, Andrew B. (VerfasserIn) , Gilbert, Mark R. (VerfasserIn) , Sampson, John H. (VerfasserIn) , Wick, Wolfgang (VerfasserIn) , Chamberlain, Marc C. (VerfasserIn) , Macdonald, David R. (VerfasserIn) , Mehta, Minesh P. (VerfasserIn) , Vogelbaum, Michael A. (VerfasserIn) , Chang, Susan M. (VerfasserIn) , Van den Bent, Martin J. (VerfasserIn) , Wen, Patrick Y. (VerfasserIn)
Dokumenttyp: Article (Journal)
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 01 March 2011
In: Neuro-Oncology
Year: 2011, Jahrgang: 13, Heft: 3, Pages: 353-361
ISSN:1523-5866
DOI:10.1093/neuonc/noq203
Online-Zugang:Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noq203
Volltext
Verfasserangaben:David A. Reardon, Evanthia Galanis, John F. DeGroot, Timothy F. Cloughesy, Jeffrey S. Wefel, Kathleen R. Lamborn, Andrew B. Lassman, Mark R. Gilbert, John H. Sampson, Wolfgang Wick, Marc C. Chamberlain, David R. Macdonald, Minesh P. Mehta, Michael A. Vogelbaum, Susan M. Chang, Martin J. Van den Bent, and Patrick Y. Wen

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a2200000 c 4500
001 1816429422
003 DE-627
005 20230710115909.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220912s2011 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1093/neuonc/noq203  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1816429422 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1816429422 
035 |a (OCoLC)1389791457 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 33  |2 sdnb 
100 1 |a Reardon, David A.  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1081843225  |0 (DE-627)846734494  |0 (DE-576)454837860  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Clinical trial end points for high-grade glioma  |b the evolving landscape  |c David A. Reardon, Evanthia Galanis, John F. DeGroot, Timothy F. Cloughesy, Jeffrey S. Wefel, Kathleen R. Lamborn, Andrew B. Lassman, Mark R. Gilbert, John H. Sampson, Wolfgang Wick, Marc C. Chamberlain, David R. Macdonald, Minesh P. Mehta, Michael A. Vogelbaum, Susan M. Chang, Martin J. Van den Bent, and Patrick Y. Wen 
264 1 |c 01 March 2011 
300 |a 9 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Gesehen am 12.09.2022 
520 |a To review the strengths and weaknesses of primary and auxiliary end points for clinical trials among patients with high-grade glioma (HGG). Recent advances in outcome for patients with newly diagnosed and recurrent HGG, coupled with the development of multiple promising therapeutics with myriad antitumor actions, have led to significant growth in the number of clinical trials for patients with HGG. Appropriate clinical trial design and the incorporation of optimal end points are imperative to efficiently and effectively evaluate such agents and continue to advance outcome. Growing recognition of limitations weakening the reliability of traditional clinical trial primary end points has generated increasing uncertainty of how best to evaluate promising therapeutics for patients with HGG. The phenomena of pseudoprogression and pseudoresponse have made imaging-based end points, including overall radiographic response and progression-free survival, problematic. Although overall survival is considered the “gold-standard” end point, recently identified active salvage therapies such as bevacizumab may diminish the association between presalvage therapy and overall survival. Finally, advances in imaging as well as the assessment of patient function and well being have strengthened interest in auxiliary end points assessing these aspects of patient care and outcome. Better appreciation of the strengths and limitations of primary end points will lead to more effective clinical trial strategies. Technical advances in imaging as well as improved survival for patients with HGG support the further development of auxiliary end points evaluating novel imaging approaches as well as measures of patient function and well being. 
700 1 |a Galanis, Evanthia  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a DeGroot, John F.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Cloughesy, Timothy F.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Wefel, Jeffrey S.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Lamborn, Kathleen R.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Lassman, Andrew B.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Gilbert, Mark R.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Sampson, John H.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Wick, Wolfgang  |d 1970-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)120297736  |0 (DE-627)080586929  |0 (DE-576)186221320  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Chamberlain, Marc C.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Macdonald, David R.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Mehta, Minesh P.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Vogelbaum, Michael A.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Chang, Susan M.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Van den Bent, Martin J.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Wen, Patrick Y.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Neuro-Oncology  |d Oxford : Oxford Univ. Press, 1999  |g 13(2011), 3, Seite 353-361  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)357167341  |w (DE-600)2094060-9  |w (DE-576)318041839  |x 1523-5866  |7 nnas  |a Clinical trial end points for high-grade glioma the evolving landscape 
773 1 8 |g volume:13  |g year:2011  |g number:3  |g pages:353-361  |g extent:9  |a Clinical trial end points for high-grade glioma the evolving landscape 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noq203  |x Verlag  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
992 |a 20220912 
993 |a Article 
994 |a 2011 
998 |g 120297736  |a Wick, Wolfgang  |m 120297736:Wick, Wolfgang  |d 910000  |d 911100  |e 910000PW120297736  |e 911100PW120297736  |k 0/910000/  |k 1/910000/911100/  |p 10 
999 |a KXP-PPN1816429422  |e 418670967X 
BIB |a Y 
SER |a journal 
JSO |a {"type":{"bibl":"article-journal","media":"Online-Ressource"},"language":["eng"],"note":["Gesehen am 12.09.2022"],"title":[{"title":"Clinical trial end points for high-grade glioma","title_sort":"Clinical trial end points for high-grade glioma","subtitle":"the evolving landscape"}],"origin":[{"dateIssuedDisp":"01 March 2011","dateIssuedKey":"2011"}],"relHost":[{"recId":"357167341","physDesc":[{"extent":"Online-Ressource"}],"disp":"Clinical trial end points for high-grade glioma the evolving landscapeNeuro-Oncology","pubHistory":["1.1999 -"],"origin":[{"publisher":"Oxford Univ. Press ; Duke University Medical Center","dateIssuedKey":"1999","publisherPlace":"Oxford ; Durham, NC","dateIssuedDisp":"1999-"}],"part":{"pages":"353-361","issue":"3","extent":"9","text":"13(2011), 3, Seite 353-361","year":"2011","volume":"13"},"title":[{"title":"Neuro-Oncology","title_sort":"Neuro-Oncology","subtitle":"official journal of the World Federation of Neuro-Oncology"}],"id":{"eki":["357167341"],"issn":["1523-5866"],"zdb":["2094060-9"]},"note":["Gesehen am 21.07.23"],"language":["eng"],"type":{"media":"Online-Ressource","bibl":"periodical"}}],"person":[{"display":"Reardon, David A.","role":"aut","given":"David A.","family":"Reardon"},{"given":"Evanthia","role":"aut","family":"Galanis","display":"Galanis, Evanthia"},{"display":"DeGroot, John F.","family":"DeGroot","role":"aut","given":"John F."},{"display":"Cloughesy, Timothy F.","given":"Timothy F.","role":"aut","family":"Cloughesy"},{"display":"Wefel, Jeffrey S.","family":"Wefel","given":"Jeffrey S.","role":"aut"},{"display":"Lamborn, Kathleen R.","family":"Lamborn","given":"Kathleen R.","role":"aut"},{"display":"Lassman, Andrew B.","family":"Lassman","role":"aut","given":"Andrew B."},{"display":"Gilbert, Mark R.","family":"Gilbert","role":"aut","given":"Mark R."},{"family":"Sampson","role":"aut","given":"John H.","display":"Sampson, John H."},{"display":"Wick, Wolfgang","role":"aut","given":"Wolfgang","family":"Wick"},{"display":"Chamberlain, Marc C.","given":"Marc C.","role":"aut","family":"Chamberlain"},{"family":"Macdonald","given":"David R.","role":"aut","display":"Macdonald, David R."},{"display":"Mehta, Minesh P.","family":"Mehta","role":"aut","given":"Minesh P."},{"display":"Vogelbaum, Michael A.","family":"Vogelbaum","role":"aut","given":"Michael A."},{"family":"Chang","given":"Susan M.","role":"aut","display":"Chang, Susan M."},{"display":"Van den Bent, Martin J.","family":"Van den Bent","role":"aut","given":"Martin J."},{"display":"Wen, Patrick Y.","family":"Wen","role":"aut","given":"Patrick Y."}],"physDesc":[{"extent":"9 S."}],"recId":"1816429422","id":{"eki":["1816429422"],"doi":["10.1093/neuonc/noq203"]},"name":{"displayForm":["David A. Reardon, Evanthia Galanis, John F. DeGroot, Timothy F. Cloughesy, Jeffrey S. Wefel, Kathleen R. Lamborn, Andrew B. Lassman, Mark R. Gilbert, John H. Sampson, Wolfgang Wick, Marc C. Chamberlain, David R. Macdonald, Minesh P. Mehta, Michael A. Vogelbaum, Susan M. Chang, Martin J. Van den Bent, and Patrick Y. Wen"]}} 
SRT |a REARDONDAVCLINICALTR0120