Do unions shape political ideologies at work?

Labor unions' largest potential for political influence likely arises from their direct connection to millions of individuals at the workplace. There they may change the political views of both unionizing workers as well as of their non-unionizing management which is arguably the most relevant...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Matzat, Johannes (VerfasserIn) , Schmeißer, Aiko (VerfasserIn)
Dokumenttyp: Book/Monograph Arbeitspapier
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: Heidelberg Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg 16 Sep. 2022
Schriftenreihe:AWI discussion paper series no. 719 (September 2022)
In: AWI discussion paper series (no. 719 (September 2022))

DOI:10.11588/heidok.00032162
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Resolving-System, kostenfrei: https://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:16-heidok-321622
Resolving-System, kostenfrei: http://dx.doi.org/10.11588/heidok.00032162
Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: http://www.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/archiv/32162
Resolving-System: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bsz:16-heidok-321622
Verlag, kostenfrei: http://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/volltextserver/32162/7/Matzat_Schmeisser_%202022_dp719.pdf
Langzeitarchivierung Nationalbibliothek: https://d-nb.info/1268288845/34
Resolving-System, kostenfrei: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/278185
Volltext
Verfasserangaben:Johannes Matzat, Aiko Schmeißer
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Labor unions' largest potential for political influence likely arises from their direct connection to millions of individuals at the workplace. There they may change the political views of both unionizing workers as well as of their non-unionizing management which is arguably the most relevant out-group. In this paper, we analyze the impact of unionization on workers' and managers' campaign contributions at the workplace over the 1980-2016 period in the United States. Therefore, we combine establishment-level union election data with transaction-level campaign contributions to federal and local candidates. In stacked Difference-in-Differences models, we find that unionization results in a leftward shift of campaign contributions. Unionization increases the support for Democrats relative to Republicans not only among workers but also among managers. To test the validity of these findings, we perform Regression Discontinuity exercises which show that there are no differential trends along placebo vote share cutoffs and that the results hold when comparing increasingly close elections. Moreover, we provide evidence that our results are not driven by compositional changes of the workforce.
Beschreibung:Online Resource
DOI:10.11588/heidok.00032162