Violations of implicit rules elicit an early negativity in the event-related potential
When participants are asked to learn letter strings, which were constructed on the basis of a complex rule system (an artificial grammar), they are able to classify novel letter strings as being grammatical or nongrammatical better than chance without explicit knowledge about the rules. We tested wh...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article (Journal) |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
September 14, 2011
|
| In: |
Neuroreport
Year: 2011, Volume: 22, Issue: 13, Pages: 642-645 |
| ISSN: | 1473-558X |
| DOI: | 10.1097/WNR.0b013e328349d146 |
| Online Access: | Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0b013e328349d146 Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://journals.lww.com/neuroreport/Fulltext/2011/09140/Violations_of_implicit_rules_elicit_an_early.4.aspx 
|
| Author Notes: | Andrea Schankin, Dirk Hagemann, Daniel Danner and Marieke Hager |
| Summary: | When participants are asked to learn letter strings, which were constructed on the basis of a complex rule system (an artificial grammar), they are able to classify novel letter strings as being grammatical or nongrammatical better than chance without explicit knowledge about the rules. We tested whether violations of such complex regularities can be detected by the brain, when strings were presented sequentially (i.e. letter by letter). Compared with regular letters, rule-violating letters elicited enlarged amplitudes of the N1 component in the event-related potential, indicating that violations are automatically detected by the brain. However, this effect occurred irrespective of the participants' classification of the strings, indicating that the brain's detection of regularity violations does not necessarily lead to correct classifications. |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | Gesehen am 10.10.2022 |
| Physical Description: | Online Resource |
| ISSN: | 1473-558X |
| DOI: | 10.1097/WNR.0b013e328349d146 |