Influence of the pre-operative time in upright sitting position and the needle type on the incidence of post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) in patients receiving a spinal saddle block for anorectal surgery
A spinal saddle block can be a safe method for anorectal surgery with a low rate of complications when performed with the right technique. A dreaded complication is the post-dural puncture headache (PDPH), which can be decreased by the use of non-cutting spinal needles. Regrettably, cutting Quincke...
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Dokumenttyp: | Article (Journal) |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
[2011]
|
| In: |
International journal of colorectal disease
Year: 2011, Jahrgang: 26, Heft: 1, Pages: 97-102 |
| ISSN: | 1432-1262 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s00384-010-1012-8 |
| Online-Zugang: | Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-010-1012-8
|
| Verfasserangaben: | Marc D. Schmittner, Nicole Urban, Andrea Janke, Christel Weiss, Dieter G. Bussen, Marc A. Burmeister, Grietje C. Beck |
| Zusammenfassung: | A spinal saddle block can be a safe method for anorectal surgery with a low rate of complications when performed with the right technique. A dreaded complication is the post-dural puncture headache (PDPH), which can be decreased by the use of non-cutting spinal needles. Regrettably, cutting Quincke (Q)-type needles are still widely used for economic reasons. Besides size and design of a spinal needle, the pre-operative time in upright sitting position may also influence the incidence of PDPH after spinal saddle block. |
|---|---|
| Beschreibung: | Published: 22 July 2010 Gesehen am 12.10.2022 |
| Beschreibung: | Online Resource |
| ISSN: | 1432-1262 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s00384-010-1012-8 |