Effect of the non-ionic surfactant Poloxamer 188 on passive permeability of poorly soluble drugs across Caco-2 cell monolayers
Drug permeability of the model drugs ketoprofen and nadolol across Caco-2 cell monolayers was determined in the absence and presence of the non-ionic surfactant Poloxamer 188 (Pluronic® F68, P-188). Stringent controls confirmed that P-188 in concentrations up to 50mg/ml did not adversely affect cell...
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
|---|---|
| Dokumenttyp: | Article (Journal) |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2011
|
| In: |
European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics
Year: 2011, Jahrgang: 79, Heft: 2, Pages: 416-422 |
| ISSN: | 1873-3441 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.ejpb.2011.04.010 |
| Online-Zugang: | Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2011.04.010 Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939641111001524 |
| Verfasserangaben: | Sarah Maud Fischer, Martin Brandl, Gert Fricker |
| Zusammenfassung: | Drug permeability of the model drugs ketoprofen and nadolol across Caco-2 cell monolayers was determined in the absence and presence of the non-ionic surfactant Poloxamer 188 (Pluronic® F68, P-188). Stringent controls confirmed that P-188 in concentrations up to 50mg/ml did not adversely affect cell viability or monolayer integrity. Equilibrium experiments confirmed that the drugs were merely passively transported. Caco-2 permeability of both drugs was found to be decreased by the surfactant in a concentration-dependent manner. Ultrafiltration revealed that both drugs were associated with surfactant micelles. The systematic investigation of micellization on passive absorption showed that association of drugs with P-188 micelles appears to depress their passive permeability under conditions where other transport mechanisms can be neglected. |
|---|---|
| Beschreibung: | Online verfügbar 28 April 2011 Gesehen am 16.01.2023 |
| Beschreibung: | Online Resource |
| ISSN: | 1873-3441 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.ejpb.2011.04.010 |