Communication with patients with limited prognosis: an integrative mixed-methods evaluation study
Oncological societies advocate the continuity of care, specialized communication, and early integration of palliative care. To comply with these recommendations, an interprofessional, longitudinally-structured communication concept, the Milestone Communication Approach (MCA), was previously develope...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article (Journal) |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2023
|
| In: |
Supportive care in cancer
Year: 2023, Volume: 31, Issue: 1, Pages: 1-10 |
| ISSN: | 1433-7339 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s00520-022-07474-9 |
| Online Access: | Resolving-System, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-07474-9 Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00520-022-07474-9 |
| Author Notes: | Anja Siegle, Laura Unsöld, Nicole Deis, Katja Krug, Jasmin Bossert, Johannes Krisam, Corinna Jung, Jana Jünger, Michel Wensing, Michael Thomas, Matthias Villalobos |
| Summary: | Oncological societies advocate the continuity of care, specialized communication, and early integration of palliative care. To comply with these recommendations, an interprofessional, longitudinally-structured communication concept, the Milestone Communication Approach (MCA), was previously developed, implemented, and evaluated. Our research question is: what are possible explanations from the patient perspective for prognosis and advance care planning being rarely a topic and for finding no differences between MCA and control groups concerning distress, quality of life, and mood? |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | Online veröffentlicht am 22. Dezember 2022 Gesehen am 07.02.2023 |
| Physical Description: | Online Resource |
| ISSN: | 1433-7339 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s00520-022-07474-9 |