Testing for prudence and skewness seeking

Numerous theoretical predictions such as precautionary saving or preventive behavior have been derived for prudent decision makers. Further, prudence can be characterized as downside risk aversion and plays a key role in preference for skewness. We use a simple experimental method to test for pruden...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Ebert, Sebastian (VerfasserIn) , Wiesen, Daniel (VerfasserIn)
Dokumenttyp: Article (Journal)
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: July 1, 2011
In: Management science
Year: 2011, Jahrgang: 57, Heft: 7, Pages: 1334-1349
ISSN:1526-5501
DOI:10.1287/mnsc.1110.1354
Online-Zugang:Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1354
Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: http://www.redi-bw.de/db/ebsco.php/search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx%3fdirect%3dtrue%26db%3dbuh%26AN%3d62820460%26lang%3dde%26site%3deds-live
Volltext
Verfasserangaben:Sebastian Ebert, Daniel Wiesen
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Numerous theoretical predictions such as precautionary saving or preventive behavior have been derived for prudent decision makers. Further, prudence can be characterized as downside risk aversion and plays a key role in preference for skewness. We use a simple experimental method to test for prudence and skewness preference in the laboratory and compare the two. To this end, we introduce a novel graphical representation of compound lotteries that is easily accessible to subjects and test it for robustness, using a factorial design. Prudence is observed on the aggregate and individual level. We find that prudence does not boil down to skewness seeking. We further provide some theoretical explanations for this result.
Beschreibung:Gesehen am 13.03.2023
Beschreibung:Online Resource
ISSN:1526-5501
DOI:10.1287/mnsc.1110.1354