Correlation of positioning and clinical results in Oxford UKA

In a prospective clinical study, 59 patients with anteromedial osteoarthritis of the knee (61 knee joints) underwent minimally invasive medial Oxford unicompartmental arthroplasty phase 3. Clinical and radiographic examinations of 56 knees were carried out at five (4-7) years. American Knee Society...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Clarius, Michael (Author) , Hauck, Christian (Author) , Seeger, Jörn Bengt (Author) , Pritsch, Maria (Author) , Merle, Christian (Author) , Aldinger, Peter (Author)
Format: Article (Journal)
Language:English
Published: 2010
In: International orthopaedics
Year: 2010, Volume: 34, Issue: 8, Pages: 1145-1151
ISSN:1432-5195
DOI:10.1007/s00264-009-0881-3
Online Access:lizenzpflichtig
Get full text
Author Notes:Michael Clarius, Christian Hauck, Joern B. Seeger, Maria Pritsch, Christian Merle, Peter R. Aldinger
Description
Summary:In a prospective clinical study, 59 patients with anteromedial osteoarthritis of the knee (61 knee joints) underwent minimally invasive medial Oxford unicompartmental arthroplasty phase 3. Clinical and radiographic examinations of 56 knees were carried out at five (4-7) years. American Knee Society (AKS) scores improved from mean 45.5 (20-80) points (knee score) and 55 (15-100) points (function score) before surgery to 90 (30-100) points in both scores after surgery. The position of each implant was determined on screened radiographs using an image intensifier. The implant position was analysed according to the Oxford X-ray rating system. We evaluated nine measures, and there was no detectable correlation between implant position and clinical result. However, long-term studies are needed before it is possible to elaborate an evidence-based guideline on positioning.
Item Description:Online veröffentlicht am 9. Oktober 2009
Gesehen am 27.04.2023
Physical Description:Online Resource
ISSN:1432-5195
DOI:10.1007/s00264-009-0881-3