Measuring inflation expectations: how the response scale shapes density forecasts

In density forecasts, respondents are asked to assign probabilities to a response scale with pre-specified ranges of inflation. In two large-scale experiments, one conducted in the US and one in Germany, we show how the specifics of the response scale determine the responses: Shifting, compressing,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Becker, Christoph (Author) , Dürsch, Peter (Author) , Eife, Thomas A. (Author)
Format: Book/Monograph Working Paper
Language:English
Published: Heidelberg Heidelberg University, Department of Economics 05 Mai 2023
Series:AWI discussion paper series no. 727 (April 2023)
In: AWI discussion paper series (no. 727 (April 2023))

DOI:10.11588/heidok.00033232
Subjects:
Online Access:Verlag, kostenfrei: http://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/volltextserver/33232/1/Becker_et_al_2023_dp727.pdf
Resolving-System, kostenfrei: https://doi.org/10.11588/heidok.00033232
Resolving-System, kostenfrei: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bsz:16-heidok-332324
Langzeitarchivierung Nationalbibliothek, kostenfrei: https://d-nb.info/1288358385/34
Verlag, kostenfrei: http://www.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/archiv/33232
Resolving-System, kostenfrei: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/278455
Get full text
Author Notes:Christoph K. Becker, Peter Duersch, Thomas A. Eife
Description
Summary:In density forecasts, respondents are asked to assign probabilities to a response scale with pre-specified ranges of inflation. In two large-scale experiments, one conducted in the US and one in Germany, we show how the specifics of the response scale determine the responses: Shifting, compressing, or expanding the scale leads to shifted, compressed, and expanded forecasts. Mean forecast, uncertainty, and disagreement vary by several percentage points. The findings have implications for survey design and for central banks' optimal adjustment of the response scales during times of high inflation.
Physical Description:Online Resource
DOI:10.11588/heidok.00033232