How many CT detector rows are necessary to perform adequate three dimensional visualization?

Introduction - The technical development of computer tomography (CT) imaging has experienced great progress. As consequence, CT data to be used for 3D visualization is not only based on 4 row CTs and 16 row CTs but also on 64 row CTs, respectively. The main goal of this study was to examine whether...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fischer, Lars (Author) , Tetzlaff, Ralf (Author) , Schöbinger, Maximilian (Author) , Radeleff, Boris (Author) , Bruckner, Thomas (Author) , Meinzer, Hans-Peter (Author) , Büchler, Markus W. (Author) , Schemmer, Peter (Author)
Format: Article (Journal)
Language:English
Published: June 2010
In: European journal of radiology
Year: 2010, Volume: 74, Issue: 3, Pages: e144-e148
ISSN:1872-7727
DOI:10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.05.033
Online Access:Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.05.033
Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X09003118
Get full text
Author Notes:Lars Fischer, Ralf Tetzlaff, Max Schöbinger, Boris Radeleff, Thomas Bruckner, H. P. Meinzer, M. W. Büchler, Peter Schemmer

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a2200000 c 4500
001 1844753220
003 DE-627
005 20230710135459.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230508s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.05.033  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1844753220 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1844753220 
035 |a (OCoLC)1389805901 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 33  |2 sdnb 
100 1 |a Fischer, Lars  |d 1971-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)122982606  |0 (DE-627)706116674  |0 (DE-576)302554661  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a How many CT detector rows are necessary to perform adequate three dimensional visualization?  |c Lars Fischer, Ralf Tetzlaff, Max Schöbinger, Boris Radeleff, Thomas Bruckner, H. P. Meinzer, M. W. Büchler, Peter Schemmer 
264 1 |c June 2010 
300 |a 5 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Online veröffentlicht am 25. Juni 2009 
500 |a Gesehen am 08.05.2023 
520 |a Introduction - The technical development of computer tomography (CT) imaging has experienced great progress. As consequence, CT data to be used for 3D visualization is not only based on 4 row CTs and 16 row CTs but also on 64 row CTs, respectively. The main goal of this study was to examine whether the increased amount of CT detector rows is correlated with improved quality of the 3D images. - Material and Methods - All CTs were acquired during routinely performed preoperative evaluation. Overall, there were 12 data sets based on 4 detector row CT, 12 data sets based on 16 detector row CT, and 10 data sets based on 64 detector row CT. Imaging data sets were transferred to the DKFZ Heidelberg using the CHILI teleradiology system. For the analysis all CT scans were examined in a blinded fashion, i.e. both the name of the patient as well as the name of the CT brand were erased. For analysis, the time for segmentation of liver, both portal and hepatic veins as well as the branching depth of portal veins and hepatic veins was recorded automatically. In addition, all results were validated in a blinded fashion based on given quality index. - Results - Segmentation of the liver was performed in significantly shorter time (p<0.01, Kruskal-Wallis test) in the 16 row CT (median 479s) compared to 4 row CT (median 611s), and 64 row CT (median 670s), respectively. The branching depth of the portal vein did not differ significantly among the 3 different data sets (p=0.37, Kruskal-Wallis test). However, the branching depth of the hepatic veins was significantly better (p=0.028, Kruskal-Wallis test) in the 4 row CT and 16 row CT compared to 64 row CT. The grading of the quality index was not statistically different for portal veins and hepatic veins (p=0.80, Kruskal-Wallis test). Even though the total quality index was better for the vessel tree based on 64 row CT data sets (mean scale 2.6) compared to 4 CT row data (mean scale 3.25) and 16 row CT data (mean scale 3.0), these differences did not reach statistical difference (p=0.53, Kruskal-Wallis test). - Conclusion - Even though 3D visualization is useful in operation planning, the quality of the 3D images appears to be not dependent of the number of CT detector rows. 
650 4 |a 3D operation planning 
650 4 |a Liver surgery 
650 4 |a Multi-detector row CT 
700 1 |a Tetzlaff, Ralf  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)116924131X  |0 (DE-627)1032992786  |0 (DE-576)512023670  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Schöbinger, Maximilian  |d 1977-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)137850204  |0 (DE-627)596148291  |0 (DE-576)304914991  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Radeleff, Boris  |d 1969-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)123910846  |0 (DE-627)706470826  |0 (DE-576)293938504  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Bruckner, Thomas  |d 1956-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)136046215  |0 (DE-627)574429298  |0 (DE-576)300798768  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Meinzer, Hans-Peter  |d 1948-2023  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)10927279X  |0 (DE-627)516177990  |0 (DE-576)289636914  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Büchler, Markus W.  |d 1955-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)120893339  |0 (DE-627)080952526  |0 (DE-576)292434146  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Schemmer, Peter  |d 1967-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1022604244  |0 (DE-627)717006794  |0 (DE-576)365668230  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t European journal of radiology  |d Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1990  |g 74(2010), 3, Seite e144-e148  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)32044483X  |w (DE-600)2005350-2  |w (DE-576)099718138  |x 1872-7727  |7 nnas  |a How many CT detector rows are necessary to perform adequate three dimensional visualization? 
773 1 8 |g volume:74  |g year:2010  |g number:3  |g pages:e144-e148  |g extent:5  |a How many CT detector rows are necessary to perform adequate three dimensional visualization? 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.05.033  |x Verlag  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X09003118  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
992 |a 20230508 
993 |a Article 
994 |a 2010 
998 |g 10927279X  |a Meinzer, Hans-Peter  |m 10927279X:Meinzer, Hans-Peter  |d 50000  |e 50000PM10927279X  |k 0/50000/  |p 6 
998 |g 137850204  |a Schöbinger, Maximilian  |m 137850204:Schöbinger, Maximilian  |d 50000  |e 50000PS137850204  |k 0/50000/  |p 3 
998 |g 116924131X  |a Tetzlaff, Ralf  |m 116924131X:Tetzlaff, Ralf  |d 50000  |e 50000PT116924131X  |k 0/50000/  |p 2 
998 |g 1022604244  |a Schemmer, Peter  |m 1022604244:Schemmer, Peter  |d 910000  |d 910200  |d 50000  |e 910000PS1022604244  |e 910200PS1022604244  |e 50000PS1022604244  |k 0/910000/  |k 1/910000/910200/  |k 0/50000/  |p 8  |y j 
998 |g 120893339  |a Büchler, Markus W.  |m 120893339:Büchler, Markus W.  |d 910000  |d 910200  |e 910000PB120893339  |e 910200PB120893339  |k 0/910000/  |k 1/910000/910200/  |p 7 
998 |g 136046215  |a Bruckner, Thomas  |m 136046215:Bruckner, Thomas  |d 910000  |d 999701  |e 910000PB136046215  |e 999701PB136046215  |k 0/910000/  |k 1/910000/999701/  |p 5 
998 |g 123910846  |a Radeleff, Boris  |m 123910846:Radeleff, Boris  |d 910000  |d 911400  |e 910000PR123910846  |e 911400PR123910846  |k 0/910000/  |k 1/910000/911400/  |p 4 
998 |g 122982606  |a Fischer, Lars  |m 122982606:Fischer, Lars  |d 910000  |d 910200  |e 910000PF122982606  |e 910200PF122982606  |k 0/910000/  |k 1/910000/910200/  |p 1  |x j 
999 |a KXP-PPN1844753220  |e 4319067517 
BIB |a Y 
SER |a journal 
JSO |a {"name":{"displayForm":["Lars Fischer, Ralf Tetzlaff, Max Schöbinger, Boris Radeleff, Thomas Bruckner, H. P. Meinzer, M. W. Büchler, Peter Schemmer"]},"note":["Online veröffentlicht am 25. Juni 2009","Gesehen am 08.05.2023"],"recId":"1844753220","id":{"eki":["1844753220"],"doi":["10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.05.033"]},"language":["eng"],"type":{"media":"Online-Ressource","bibl":"article-journal"},"origin":[{"dateIssuedDisp":"June 2010","dateIssuedKey":"2010"}],"physDesc":[{"extent":"5 S."}],"person":[{"given":"Lars","family":"Fischer","display":"Fischer, Lars","role":"aut"},{"given":"Ralf","display":"Tetzlaff, Ralf","family":"Tetzlaff","role":"aut"},{"role":"aut","display":"Schöbinger, Maximilian","family":"Schöbinger","given":"Maximilian"},{"display":"Radeleff, Boris","family":"Radeleff","given":"Boris","role":"aut"},{"role":"aut","given":"Thomas","family":"Bruckner","display":"Bruckner, Thomas"},{"role":"aut","given":"Hans-Peter","display":"Meinzer, Hans-Peter","family":"Meinzer"},{"role":"aut","given":"Markus W.","display":"Büchler, Markus W.","family":"Büchler"},{"role":"aut","given":"Peter","display":"Schemmer, Peter","family":"Schemmer"}],"title":[{"title_sort":"How many CT detector rows are necessary to perform adequate three dimensional visualization?","title":"How many CT detector rows are necessary to perform adequate three dimensional visualization?"}],"relHost":[{"type":{"media":"Online-Ressource","bibl":"periodical"},"id":{"zdb":["2005350-2"],"issn":["1872-7727"],"eki":["32044483X"]},"language":["eng"],"origin":[{"publisherPlace":"Amsterdam [u.a.]","dateIssuedDisp":"1990-","publisher":"Elsevier Science","dateIssuedKey":"1990"}],"part":{"year":"2010","extent":"5","issue":"3","volume":"74","pages":"e144-e148","text":"74(2010), 3, Seite e144-e148"},"title":[{"title":"European journal of radiology","subtitle":"EJR","title_sort":"European journal of radiology"}],"titleAlt":[{"title":"EJR"}],"physDesc":[{"extent":"Online-Ressource"}],"disp":"How many CT detector rows are necessary to perform adequate three dimensional visualization?European journal of radiology","note":["Gesehen am 05.02.20"],"pubHistory":["Nachgewiesen 10.1990 -"],"recId":"32044483X"}]} 
SRT |a FISCHERLARHOWMANYCTD2010