Response and remission criteria in major depression - a validation of current practice

Remission and response were suggested as the most relevant outcome criteria for the treatment of depression. There is still marked uncertainty as to what cut-offs should be used on current depression rating scales. The goal of the present study was to compare the validity of different HAMD, MADRS an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Riedel, Michael (VerfasserIn) , Möller, Hans-Jürgen (VerfasserIn) , Obermeier, Michael (VerfasserIn) , Schennach-Wolff, Rebecca (VerfasserIn) , Bauer, Michael (VerfasserIn) , Adli, Mazda (VerfasserIn) , Kronmüller, Klaus-Thomas (VerfasserIn) , Nickel, Thomas (VerfasserIn) , Brieger, Peter (VerfasserIn) , Laux, Gerd (VerfasserIn) , Bender, Wolfram (VerfasserIn) , Heuser, Isabella (VerfasserIn) , Zeiler, Joachim (VerfasserIn) , Gaebel, Wolfgang (VerfasserIn) , Seemüller, Florian (VerfasserIn)
Dokumenttyp: Article (Journal)
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 5 May 2010
In: Journal of psychiatric research
Year: 2010, Jahrgang: 44, Heft: 15, Pages: 1063-1068
ISSN:1879-1379
DOI:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.03.006
Online-Zugang:Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.03.006
Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022395610000750
Volltext
Verfasserangaben:Michael Riedel, Hans-Jürgen Möller, Michael Obermeier, Rebecca Schennach-Wolff, Michael Bauer, Mazda Adli, Klaus Kronmüller, Thomas Nickel, Peter Brieger, Gerd Laux, Wolfram Bender, Isabella Heuser, Joachim Zeiler, Wolfgang Gaebel, Florian Seemüller

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a2200000 c 4500
001 1845403320
003 DE-627
005 20230710133630.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230515s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.03.006  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1845403320 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1845403320 
035 |a (OCoLC)1389804117 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 33  |2 sdnb 
100 1 |a Riedel, Michael  |d 1964-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)12009522X  |0 (DE-627)69637577X  |0 (DE-576)292038585  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Response and remission criteria in major depression - a validation of current practice  |c Michael Riedel, Hans-Jürgen Möller, Michael Obermeier, Rebecca Schennach-Wolff, Michael Bauer, Mazda Adli, Klaus Kronmüller, Thomas Nickel, Peter Brieger, Gerd Laux, Wolfram Bender, Isabella Heuser, Joachim Zeiler, Wolfgang Gaebel, Florian Seemüller 
264 1 |c 5 May 2010 
300 |a 6 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Gesehen am 15.05.2023 
520 |a Remission and response were suggested as the most relevant outcome criteria for the treatment of depression. There is still marked uncertainty as to what cut-offs should be used on current depression rating scales. The goal of the present study was to compare the validity of different HAMD, MADRS and BDI cut-offs for response and remission. The naturalistic prospective study was performed in 12 psychiatric hospitals in Germany. All evaluable patients (n=846) were hospitalized and had to meet DSM-IV criteria for major depressive disorder. Biweekly ratings were assessed using HAMD-21, MADRS and BDI. A CGI-S score of 1 and a CGI-I score of at least 2 was used as the primary comparative measure of remission and response, respectively. A HAMD-21 cut-off≤7 (AUC: 0.92), HAMD-17 cut-of≤6 (AUC: 0.90), MADRS cut-off≤7 (AUC: 0.94) and BDI cut-off≤12 (AUC: 0.83) were associated with a maximum of specificity and sensitivity for defining remission. A minimum decrease of 47% of the HAMD-21 (AUC: 0.90), ≤57% for HAMD-17 (AUC: 0.89), ≤ 46% for MADRS (0.91) and a decrease of 47% for the BDI baseline score (AUC: 0.78) best corresponded CGI response criteria. Our data largely confirmed currently used remission and response criteria in naturalistically treated patients. 
650 4 |a BDI 
650 4 |a Bipolar 
650 4 |a CGI 
650 4 |a Cut-off 
650 4 |a HAMD-17 
650 4 |a HMD-21 
650 4 |a Inpatients 
650 4 |a MADRS 
650 4 |a Major depression 
650 4 |a Remission 
650 4 |a Response 
700 1 |a Möller, Hans-Jürgen  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Obermeier, Michael  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Schennach-Wolff, Rebecca  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Bauer, Michael  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Adli, Mazda  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Kronmüller, Klaus-Thomas  |d 1964-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)121347559  |0 (DE-627)705401626  |0 (DE-576)181479478  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Nickel, Thomas  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Brieger, Peter  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Laux, Gerd  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Bender, Wolfram  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Heuser, Isabella  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Zeiler, Joachim  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Gaebel, Wolfgang  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Seemüller, Florian  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of psychiatric research  |d Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1961  |g 44(2010), 15 vom: Mai, Seite 1063-1068  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)30666111X  |w (DE-600)1500641-4  |w (DE-576)081986718  |x 1879-1379  |7 nnas  |a Response and remission criteria in major depression - a validation of current practice 
773 1 8 |g volume:44  |g year:2010  |g number:15  |g month:05  |g pages:1063-1068  |g extent:6  |a Response and remission criteria in major depression - a validation of current practice 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.03.006  |x Verlag  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022395610000750  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
992 |a 20230515 
993 |a Article 
994 |a 2010 
998 |g 121347559  |a Kronmüller, Klaus-Thomas  |m 121347559:Kronmüller, Klaus-Thomas  |d 50000  |e 50000PK121347559  |k 0/50000/  |p 7 
999 |a KXP-PPN1845403320  |e 4322111394 
BIB |a Y 
SER |a journal 
JSO |a {"title":[{"title_sort":"Response and remission criteria in major depression - a validation of current practice","title":"Response and remission criteria in major depression - a validation of current practice"}],"person":[{"given":"Michael","family":"Riedel","role":"aut","display":"Riedel, Michael","roleDisplay":"VerfasserIn"},{"family":"Möller","given":"Hans-Jürgen","roleDisplay":"VerfasserIn","display":"Möller, Hans-Jürgen","role":"aut"},{"given":"Michael","family":"Obermeier","role":"aut","display":"Obermeier, Michael","roleDisplay":"VerfasserIn"},{"role":"aut","roleDisplay":"VerfasserIn","display":"Schennach-Wolff, Rebecca","given":"Rebecca","family":"Schennach-Wolff"},{"display":"Bauer, Michael","roleDisplay":"VerfasserIn","role":"aut","family":"Bauer","given":"Michael"},{"family":"Adli","given":"Mazda","display":"Adli, Mazda","roleDisplay":"VerfasserIn","role":"aut"},{"family":"Kronmüller","given":"Klaus-Thomas","roleDisplay":"VerfasserIn","display":"Kronmüller, Klaus-Thomas","role":"aut"},{"role":"aut","display":"Nickel, Thomas","roleDisplay":"VerfasserIn","given":"Thomas","family":"Nickel"},{"role":"aut","display":"Brieger, Peter","roleDisplay":"VerfasserIn","given":"Peter","family":"Brieger"},{"given":"Gerd","family":"Laux","role":"aut","display":"Laux, Gerd","roleDisplay":"VerfasserIn"},{"roleDisplay":"VerfasserIn","display":"Bender, Wolfram","role":"aut","family":"Bender","given":"Wolfram"},{"family":"Heuser","given":"Isabella","display":"Heuser, Isabella","roleDisplay":"VerfasserIn","role":"aut"},{"display":"Zeiler, Joachim","roleDisplay":"VerfasserIn","role":"aut","family":"Zeiler","given":"Joachim"},{"roleDisplay":"VerfasserIn","display":"Gaebel, Wolfgang","role":"aut","family":"Gaebel","given":"Wolfgang"},{"role":"aut","display":"Seemüller, Florian","roleDisplay":"VerfasserIn","given":"Florian","family":"Seemüller"}],"type":{"bibl":"article-journal","media":"Online-Ressource"},"note":["Gesehen am 15.05.2023"],"recId":"1845403320","language":["eng"],"origin":[{"dateIssuedDisp":"5 May 2010","dateIssuedKey":"2010"}],"id":{"eki":["1845403320"],"doi":["10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.03.006"]},"name":{"displayForm":["Michael Riedel, Hans-Jürgen Möller, Michael Obermeier, Rebecca Schennach-Wolff, Michael Bauer, Mazda Adli, Klaus Kronmüller, Thomas Nickel, Peter Brieger, Gerd Laux, Wolfram Bender, Isabella Heuser, Joachim Zeiler, Wolfgang Gaebel, Florian Seemüller"]},"physDesc":[{"extent":"6 S."}],"relHost":[{"physDesc":[{"extent":"Online-Ressource"}],"origin":[{"publisherPlace":"Amsterdam [u.a.]","publisher":"Elsevier Science","dateIssuedKey":"1961","dateIssuedDisp":"1961-"}],"id":{"eki":["30666111X"],"zdb":["1500641-4"],"issn":["1879-1379"]},"pubHistory":["1.1961/63 -"],"part":{"issue":"15","pages":"1063-1068","year":"2010","extent":"6","volume":"44","text":"44(2010), 15 vom: Mai, Seite 1063-1068"},"disp":"Response and remission criteria in major depression - a validation of current practiceJournal of psychiatric research","type":{"bibl":"periodical","media":"Online-Ressource"},"note":["Gesehen am 19.02.20"],"language":["eng"],"recId":"30666111X","title":[{"title":"Journal of psychiatric research","title_sort":"Journal of psychiatric research"}]}]} 
SRT |a RIEDELMICHRESPONSEAN5201