Buchumschlag

Response and remission criteria in major depression - a validation of current practice

Remission and response were suggested as the most relevant outcome criteria for the treatment of depression. There is still marked uncertainty as to what cut-offs should be used on current depression rating scales. The goal of the present study was to compare the validity of different HAMD, MADRS an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Riedel, Michael (VerfasserIn) , Möller, Hans-Jürgen (VerfasserIn) , Obermeier, Michael (VerfasserIn) , Schennach-Wolff, Rebecca (VerfasserIn) , Bauer, Michael (VerfasserIn) , Adli, Mazda (VerfasserIn) , Kronmüller, Klaus-Thomas (VerfasserIn) , Nickel, Thomas (VerfasserIn) , Brieger, Peter (VerfasserIn) , Laux, Gerd (VerfasserIn) , Bender, Wolfram (VerfasserIn) , Heuser, Isabella (VerfasserIn) , Zeiler, Joachim (VerfasserIn) , Gaebel, Wolfgang (VerfasserIn) , Seemüller, Florian (VerfasserIn)
Dokumenttyp: Article (Journal)
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 5 May 2010
In: Journal of psychiatric research
Year: 2010, Jahrgang: 44, Heft: 15, Pages: 1063-1068
ISSN:1879-1379
DOI:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.03.006
Online-Zugang:Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.03.006
Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022395610000750
Volltext
Verfasserangaben:Michael Riedel, Hans-Jürgen Möller, Michael Obermeier, Rebecca Schennach-Wolff, Michael Bauer, Mazda Adli, Klaus Kronmüller, Thomas Nickel, Peter Brieger, Gerd Laux, Wolfram Bender, Isabella Heuser, Joachim Zeiler, Wolfgang Gaebel, Florian Seemüller
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Remission and response were suggested as the most relevant outcome criteria for the treatment of depression. There is still marked uncertainty as to what cut-offs should be used on current depression rating scales. The goal of the present study was to compare the validity of different HAMD, MADRS and BDI cut-offs for response and remission. The naturalistic prospective study was performed in 12 psychiatric hospitals in Germany. All evaluable patients (n=846) were hospitalized and had to meet DSM-IV criteria for major depressive disorder. Biweekly ratings were assessed using HAMD-21, MADRS and BDI. A CGI-S score of 1 and a CGI-I score of at least 2 was used as the primary comparative measure of remission and response, respectively. A HAMD-21 cut-off≤7 (AUC: 0.92), HAMD-17 cut-of≤6 (AUC: 0.90), MADRS cut-off≤7 (AUC: 0.94) and BDI cut-off≤12 (AUC: 0.83) were associated with a maximum of specificity and sensitivity for defining remission. A minimum decrease of 47% of the HAMD-21 (AUC: 0.90), ≤57% for HAMD-17 (AUC: 0.89), ≤ 46% for MADRS (0.91) and a decrease of 47% for the BDI baseline score (AUC: 0.78) best corresponded CGI response criteria. Our data largely confirmed currently used remission and response criteria in naturalistically treated patients.
Beschreibung:Gesehen am 15.05.2023
Beschreibung:Online Resource
ISSN:1879-1379
DOI:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.03.006

Ähnliche Einträge