(Un)trustworthy pledges and cooperation in social dilemmas

Pledges feature in international climate cooperation since the 2015 Paris Agreement. We explore how differences in pledgers' trustworthiness affect outcomes in a social dilemma that parallels climate change. In an online experiment, two participants interact with a randomly matched third player...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Goeschl, Timo (VerfasserIn) , Soldà, Alice (VerfasserIn)
Dokumenttyp: Buch/Monographie Arbeitspapier
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: Heidelberg Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg 15 Mai 2023
Schriftenreihe:AWI discussion paper series no. 728 (May 2023)
In: AWI discussion paper series (no. 728 (May 2023))

DOI:10.11588/heidok.00033250
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Resolving-System, kostenfrei: https://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:16-heidok-332501
Resolving-System, kostenfrei: http://dx.doi.org/10.11588/heidok.00033250
Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: http://www.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/archiv/33250
Resolving-System, kostenfrei: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bsz:16-heidok-332501
Langzeitarchivierung Nationalbibliothek, kostenfrei: https://d-nb.info/1289492581/34
Resolving-System, kostenfrei: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/278470
Volltext
Verfasserangaben:Timo Goeschl, Alice Soldà
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Pledges feature in international climate cooperation since the 2015 Paris Agreement. We explore how differences in pledgers' trustworthiness affect outcomes in a social dilemma that parallels climate change. In an online experiment, two participants interact with a randomly matched third player in a repeat maintenance game with a pledge stage. Treatments vary whether participants are matched with a player that is more or less trustworthy as revealed by behavior in a promise-keeping game; and whether they observe that trustworthiness. We find that participants knowingly matched with more trustworthy players cooperate more than participants matched with less trustworthy players (knowingly or unknowingly), but also more than participants unknowingly matched with more trustworthy players. In contrast, participants knowingly matched with less trustworthy players do not cooperate less than participants who are unknowingly so. Our findings suggest that the use of pledges, as per the Paris Agreement, can leverage the power of trustworthiness to enhance cooperation.
Beschreibung:Online Resource
DOI:10.11588/heidok.00033250