Fast-painting of human metaphase spreads using a chromosome-specific, repeat-depleted DNA library probe

For chromosome painting, in situ suppression of repetitive DNA sequences has been well established. Such standard protocols usually require large amounts of Cot-1 DNA®. Recently, it has become possible to deplete repetitive DNA sequences from library probes by magnetic purification and PCR-assisted...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Durm, Markus (VerfasserIn) , Schüssler, L. (VerfasserIn) , Münch, H. (VerfasserIn) , Craig, J. (VerfasserIn) , Ludwig, Horst (VerfasserIn) , Hausmann, Michael (VerfasserIn) , Cremer, Christoph (VerfasserIn)
Dokumenttyp: Article (Journal)
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 1998
In: BioTechniques
Year: 1998, Jahrgang: 24, Heft: 5, Pages: 820-825
ISSN:1940-9818
DOI:10.2144/98245dt02
Online-Zugang:Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.2144/98245dt02
Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://www.future-science.com/doi/10.2144/98245dt02
Volltext
Verfasserangaben:M. Durm, L. Schüssler, H. Münch, J. Craig, H. Ludwig, M. Hausmann, C. Cremer
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:For chromosome painting, in situ suppression of repetitive DNA sequences has been well established. Such standard protocols usually require large amounts of Cot-1 DNA®. Recently, it has become possible to deplete repetitive DNA sequences from library probes by magnetic purification and PCR-assisted affinity chromatography. These “repeat-depleted library probes” appear to be extremely useful for Fast-FISH, a technique that omits denaturing chemical agents such as formamide in the hybridization buffer, resulting in a substantial acceleration and simplification of the complete protocol. Shown here is the application of Fast-FISH to a repeat-depleted, directly fluorochrome-labeled library probe of the qarm of chromosome 15 (Fast-Painting) for human lymphocyte metaphase spreads. Following painting without Cot-1 DNA and without formamide, visual inspection revealed sufficient chromosome painting after a few hours of hybridization. The fluorescence signals of the labeling sites were analyzed after hybridization times of 1 and 2 h (in one case, 4 h) using digital fluorescence microscopy. The painting efficiency expressed in values of relative fluorescence signal ratios was quantitatively evaluated by image analysis using line-scan procedures and area-morphometry of mean luminance. Two preparation protocols (ethanol dehydration without and with RNase A treatment followed by pepsin digestion for four different exposure times) were compared. These results indicated that RNase A treatment and pepsin digestion are steps that can be omitted.
Beschreibung:Elektronische Reproduktion der Druck-Ausgabe 15. August 2018
Gesehen am 03.06.2023
Beschreibung:Online Resource
ISSN:1940-9818
DOI:10.2144/98245dt02