Quality Assessment of the Academic Freedom Index: Strengths, Weaknesses, and How Best to Use It

This paper reviews the data quality of the first systematic global measurement of academic freedom, namely the Academic Freedom Index (AFI) by using a data quality assessment approach proposed by McMann et al. (2022). By analyzing three distinct components of data quality (content validity, the data...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Lott, Lars (VerfasserIn) , Spannagel, Janika (VerfasserIn)
Dokumenttyp: Buch/Monographie Arbeitspapier
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: [S.l.] SSRN [2023]
Schriftenreihe:Working paper series 2023:142
In: Working paper series (2023:142)

DOI:10.2139/ssrn.4495392
Online-Zugang:Verlag, kostenfrei: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4495392
Resolving-System, kostenfrei: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4495392
Volltext

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000 c 4500
001 1859979610
003 DE-627
005 20240205154337.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230919s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.2139/ssrn.4495392  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1859979610 
035 |a (DE-599)KEP096357479 
035 |a (OCoLC)1398444032 
035 |a (ELVSSRN)4495392 
035 |a (DE-627-1)096357479 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 16  |2 sdnb 
100 1 |a Lott, Lars  |d 1990-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1175538248  |0 (DE-627)104654943X  |0 (DE-576)516303031  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Quality Assessment of the Academic Freedom Index  |b Strengths, Weaknesses, and How Best to Use It 
264 1 |a [S.l.]  |b SSRN  |c [2023] 
300 |a 1 Online-Ressource (68 p) 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a V-Dem Working Paper  |v 2023:142 
500 |a Nach Informationen von SSRN wurde die ursprüngliche Fassung des Dokuments June 2023 erstellt 
506 0 |a Open Access  |e Controlled Vocabulary for Access Rights  |u http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2  |f unrestricted online access 
520 |a This paper reviews the data quality of the first systematic global measurement of academic freedom, namely the Academic Freedom Index (AFI) by using a data quality assessment approach proposed by McMann et al. (2022). By analyzing three distinct components of data quality (content validity, the data generation process, and convergent validity), this article examines the specific strengths and potential shortcomings of the AFI. The findings indicate that the AFI does well in terms of its theoretical embeddedness (within some conceptual limits), of the transparent data generation process and the handling of expert assessments, as well as of its temporal and spatial coverage. A critical assessment of the level of disagreement between expert coders further shows that there are few systematic predictors, providing no evidence for problematic biases among AFI coders. Overall, we conclude that the data quality of the AFI is comparatively high but that it could be further increased by recruiting even more experts and thereby enhancing the Bayesian IRT model’s performance 
653 |a Academic Freedom Index  |a validity  |a reliability  |a academic freedom  |a Bayesian IRT 
700 1 |a Spannagel, Janika  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1295572419  |0 (DE-627)1852278994  |4 aut 
830 0 |a Working paper series  |v 2023:142  |9 2023,142  |w (DE-627)166603617X  |w (DE-600)2972889-7  |7 am 
856 4 0 |u https://ssrn.com/abstract=4495392  |m X:ELVSSRN  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4495392  |m X:ELVSSRN  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei 
912 |a ZDB-33-ERN 
951 |a BO 
992 |a 20240205 
993 |a WorkingPaper 
994 |a 2023 
998 |g 1175538248  |a Lott, Lars  |m 1175538248:Lott, Lars  |d 180000  |d 180500  |e 180000PL1175538248  |e 180500PL1175538248  |k 0/180000/  |k 1/180000/180500/  |p 1  |x j 
999 |a KXP-PPN1859979610  |e 447654357X 
BIB |a Y 
JSO |a {"physDesc":[{"extent":"1 Online-Ressource (68 p)"}],"note":["Nach Informationen von SSRN wurde die ursprüngliche Fassung des Dokuments June 2023 erstellt"],"type":{"media":"Online-Ressource","bibl":"book"},"language":["eng"],"recId":"1859979610","relMultPart":[{"title":[{"title_sort":"Working paper series","title":"Working paper series"}],"language":["eng"],"corporate":[{"display":"Göteborgs universitet","roleDisplay":"Herausgebendes Organ","role":"isb"}],"recId":"166603617X","disp":"V-Dem Working Paper","note":["Gesehen am 21.5.2019"],"type":{"media":"Online-Ressource","bibl":"serial"},"part":{"number":["2023:142"],"number_sort":["2023,142"]},"pubHistory":["1 (march 2015)-"],"name":{"displayForm":["The Varieties of Democracy Institute, V-Dem Institute; University of Gothenburg, Dep. of Political Science"]},"id":{"zdb":["2972889-7"],"eki":["166603617X"]},"origin":[{"publisherPlace":"Gothenburg","publisher":"V-Dem Institute","dateIssuedDisp":"[2015]-"}],"physDesc":[{"extent":"Online-Ressource"}],"titleUni":[{"title":"Working paper series (V-Dem Institute)"}],"dispAlt":"Working paper series"}],"person":[{"given":"Lars","family":"Lott","role":"aut","display":"Lott, Lars","roleDisplay":"VerfasserIn"},{"role":"aut","roleDisplay":"VerfasserIn","display":"Spannagel, Janika","given":"Janika","family":"Spannagel"}],"origin":[{"publisherPlace":"[S.l.]","publisher":"SSRN","dateIssuedKey":"2023","dateIssuedDisp":"[2023]"}],"title":[{"subtitle":"Strengths, Weaknesses, and How Best to Use It","title":"Quality Assessment of the Academic Freedom Index","title_sort":"Quality Assessment of the Academic Freedom Index"}],"id":{"doi":["10.2139/ssrn.4495392"],"eki":["1859979610"]}} 
SRT |a LOTTLARSSPQUALITYASS2023