Drei textkritische Probleme in der ersten Ekloge des Calpurnius
In this paper I will discuss three passages in Calpurnius Siculus' first Eclogue whose text is disputed: In Calp. ecl. 1,35 Jan van Vliet's conjecture fatis has nearly erased the transmitted fagis from both editors' and interpreters' memory, in 1,57 a simple scribe's error h...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Dokumenttyp: | Article (Journal) |
| Sprache: | Deutsch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2023
|
| In: |
Wiener Studien
Year: 2023, Jahrgang: 136, Pages: 147-159 |
| ISSN: | 1813-3924 |
| DOI: | 10.1553/wst136s147 |
| Online-Zugang: | Resolving-System, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1553/wst136s147 Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://hw.oeaw.ac.at?arp=0x003e5d26 
|
| Verfasserangaben: | Heiko Ullrich |
| Zusammenfassung: | In this paper I will discuss three passages in Calpurnius Siculus' first Eclogue whose text is disputed: In Calp. ecl. 1,35 Jan van Vliet's conjecture fatis has nearly erased the transmitted fagis from both editors' and interpreters' memory, in 1,57 a simple scribe's error has led to otherwise unsubstantiable guesses about a substantive *discordium, and in 1,76 the splitted transmission which has both fervit and servit can be decided in favour of the latter by a closer look at the context. |
|---|---|
| Beschreibung: | Online Resource |
| ISSN: | 1813-3924 |
| DOI: | 10.1553/wst136s147 |