Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic versus open radical cystectomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Context - Multiple randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the three approaches of radical cystectomy (robotic assisted [RARC], laparoscopic [LRC], and open [ORC]) have been published recently. - Objective - To perform a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) of RCTs comparing RARC, LRC, a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kowalewski, Karl-Friedrich (Author) , Wieland, Victoria (Author) , Kriegmair, Maximilian (Author) , Uysal, Daniel (Author) , Sicker, Tom (Author) , Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe (Author) , Michel, Maurice Stephan (Author) , Haney, Caelán Max (Author)
Format: Article (Journal)
Language:English
Published: May 2023
In: European urology focus
Year: 2023, Volume: 9, Issue: 3, Pages: 480-490
ISSN:2405-4569
DOI:10.1016/j.euf.2022.12.001
Online Access:Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2022.12.001
Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405456922002851
Get full text
Author Notes:Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski, Victoria L.S. Wieland, Maximilian C. Kriegmair, Daniel Uysal, Tom Sicker, Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg, Maurice-Stephan Michel, Caelán M. Haney

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a2200000 c 4500
001 1867461374
003 DE-627
005 20240329080849.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231024s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1016/j.euf.2022.12.001  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1867461374 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1867461374 
035 |a (OCoLC)1425210122 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 33  |2 sdnb 
100 1 |a Kowalewski, Karl-Friedrich  |d 1989-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1100724192  |0 (DE-627)859518825  |0 (DE-576)469770740  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic versus open radical cystectomy  |b a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials  |c Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski, Victoria L.S. Wieland, Maximilian C. Kriegmair, Daniel Uysal, Tom Sicker, Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg, Maurice-Stephan Michel, Caelán M. Haney 
264 1 |c May 2023 
300 |b Illustrationen 
300 |a 11 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Online verfügbar: 16. Dezember 2022 
500 |a Gesehen am 24.10.2023 
520 |a Context - Multiple randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the three approaches of radical cystectomy (robotic assisted [RARC], laparoscopic [LRC], and open [ORC]) have been published recently. - Objective - To perform a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) of RCTs comparing RARC, LRC, and ORC, with the primary outcomes being overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). - Evidence acquisition - A search of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, and Web of Science (last search: 20/05/2022) was performed. The prospectively registered protocol stated that a NMA of the primary outcomes would be performed only if there was sufficient evidence to compare all three approaches. In case of insufficient evidence, a comparison between the two most common approaches would be performed. The risk of bias and certainty of evidence (CoE) via the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach was assessed for direct evidence and the most common comparison. - Evidence synthesis - Ten trials were identified. There was insufficient evidence for a NMA of all approaches for the primary outcomes. The meta-analysis of RARC and ORC showed no differences in OS (hazard ratio (HR) [confidence interval (CI): 0.98 [0.73-1.30]) and RFS (HR [CI]: 0.99 [0.75-1.31]) with moderate CoE. The secondary outcomes showed lower rates of transfusions (p < 0.01) and longer operating time (p < 0.01) with high CoE for RARC compared with ORC. There were no differences for quality of life, positive margins, length of hospital stay, or major complications (all p > 0.05). - Conclusions - There are no differences in OS and RFS between RARC and ORC, with moderate CoE. Clinicians should likely apply the approach with which they can reach the highest case volume and in which they have the most experience. - Patient summary - We looked at the difference between three types (robotic assisted, laparoscopic, and open) of operating techniques for radical cystectomy. The data showed no significant differences in OS between the robotic-assisted and the open technique, while enough data were not available to make a comparison with conventional laparoscopic surgery. 
650 4 |a Bladder cancer 
650 4 |a Evidence-based medicine 
650 4 |a Meta-analysis 
650 4 |a Open surgery 
650 4 |a Radical cystectomy 
650 4 |a Randomized controlled trial 
650 4 |a Robotic-assisted surgery 
700 1 |a Wieland, Victoria  |d 1996-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1310096058  |0 (DE-627)1870484886  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Kriegmair, Maximilian  |d 1987-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1049742745  |0 (DE-627)782573347  |0 (DE-576)403726840  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Uysal, Daniel  |d 1995-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1234075229  |0 (DE-627)1758939249  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Sicker, Tom  |d 1975-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)137393911  |0 (DE-627)592610004  |0 (DE-576)303541342  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe  |d 1964-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)172387833  |0 (DE-627)671506773  |0 (DE-576)169372782  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Michel, Maurice Stephan  |d 1970-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)121842568  |0 (DE-627)705674134  |0 (DE-576)29291363X  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Haney, Caelán Max  |d 1994-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1194593518  |0 (DE-627)167682281X  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t European urology focus  |d Amsterdam : Elsevier, 2015  |g 9(2023), 3 vom: Mai, Seite 480-490  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)863008194  |w (DE-600)2861750-2  |w (DE-576)474000001  |x 2405-4569  |7 nnas  |a Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic versus open radical cystectomy a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials 
773 1 8 |g volume:9  |g year:2023  |g number:3  |g month:05  |g pages:480-490  |g extent:11  |a Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic versus open radical cystectomy a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2022.12.001  |x Verlag  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405456922002851  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
992 |a 20231024 
993 |a Article 
994 |a 2023 
998 |g 121842568  |a Michel, Maurice Stephan  |m 121842568:Michel, Maurice Stephan  |d 60000  |d 60000  |d 63100  |e 60000PM121842568  |e 60000PM121842568  |e 63100PM121842568  |k 0/60000/  |k 0/60000/  |k 1/60000/63100/  |p 7 
998 |g 1234075229  |a Uysal, Daniel  |m 1234075229:Uysal, Daniel  |d 60000  |d 60000  |d 63100  |e 60000PU1234075229  |e 60000PU1234075229  |e 63100PU1234075229  |k 0/60000/  |k 0/60000/  |k 1/60000/63100/  |p 4 
998 |g 1049742745  |a Kriegmair, Maximilian  |m 1049742745:Kriegmair, Maximilian  |d 60000  |d 63100  |e 60000PK1049742745  |e 63100PK1049742745  |k 0/60000/  |k 1/60000/63100/  |p 3 
998 |g 1310096058  |a Wieland, Victoria  |m 1310096058:Wieland, Victoria  |d 60000  |e 60000PW1310096058  |k 0/60000/  |p 2 
998 |g 1194593518  |a Haney, Caelán Max  |m 1194593518:Haney, Caelán Max  |d 50000  |e 50000PH1194593518  |k 0/50000/  |p 8  |y j 
998 |g 1100724192  |a Kowalewski, Karl-Friedrich  |m 1100724192:Kowalewski, Karl-Friedrich  |d 60000  |d 60000  |d 63100  |e 60000PK1100724192  |e 60000PK1100724192  |e 63100PK1100724192  |k 0/60000/  |k 0/60000/  |k 1/60000/63100/  |p 1  |x j 
999 |a KXP-PPN1867461374  |e 4396233825 
BIB |a Y 
SER |a journal 
JSO |a {"person":[{"given":"Karl-Friedrich","role":"aut","family":"Kowalewski","display":"Kowalewski, Karl-Friedrich"},{"role":"aut","given":"Victoria","family":"Wieland","display":"Wieland, Victoria"},{"given":"Maximilian","role":"aut","family":"Kriegmair","display":"Kriegmair, Maximilian"},{"family":"Uysal","display":"Uysal, Daniel","given":"Daniel","role":"aut"},{"family":"Sicker","display":"Sicker, Tom","role":"aut","given":"Tom"},{"family":"Stolzenburg","display":"Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe","given":"Jens-Uwe","role":"aut"},{"family":"Michel","display":"Michel, Maurice Stephan","role":"aut","given":"Maurice Stephan"},{"role":"aut","given":"Caelán Max","family":"Haney","display":"Haney, Caelán Max"}],"language":["eng"],"type":{"bibl":"article-journal","media":"Online-Ressource"},"origin":[{"dateIssuedDisp":"May 2023","dateIssuedKey":"2023"}],"note":["Online verfügbar: 16. Dezember 2022","Gesehen am 24.10.2023"],"title":[{"title_sort":"Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic versus open radical cystectomy","subtitle":"a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","title":"Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic versus open radical cystectomy"}],"id":{"doi":["10.1016/j.euf.2022.12.001"],"eki":["1867461374"]},"name":{"displayForm":["Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski, Victoria L.S. Wieland, Maximilian C. Kriegmair, Daniel Uysal, Tom Sicker, Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg, Maurice-Stephan Michel, Caelán M. Haney"]},"physDesc":[{"noteIll":"Illustrationen","extent":"11 S."}],"recId":"1867461374","relHost":[{"disp":"Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic versus open radical cystectomy a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsEuropean urology focus","type":{"bibl":"periodical","media":"Online-Ressource"},"pubHistory":["Volume 1, issue 1 (August 2015)-"],"note":["Gesehen am 13. Juli 2016"],"origin":[{"publisherPlace":"Amsterdam","publisher":"Elsevier","dateIssuedDisp":"[2015]-"}],"title":[{"title_sort":"European urology focus","title":"European urology focus"}],"id":{"issn":["2405-4569"],"zdb":["2861750-2"],"eki":["863008194"]},"name":{"displayForm":["European Association of Urology (EAU)"]},"physDesc":[{"extent":"Online-Ressource"}],"recId":"863008194","part":{"year":"2023","pages":"480-490","text":"9(2023), 3 vom: Mai, Seite 480-490","issue":"3","volume":"9","extent":"11"},"language":["eng"]}]} 
SRT |a KOWALEWSKIROBOTICASS2023