Rural roads and national welfare: are "local" methods of evaluation satisfactory?

Do 'local' methods of evaluation, such as partial equilibrium analysis at market prices or estimation of shadow prices, provide reliable assessments of a large rural roads programme's social profitability? Consider a small open economy with one city and a rural hinterland, two traded...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bell, Clive (Author)
Format: Book/Monograph Working Paper
Language:English
Published: Heidelberg Heidelberg University, Department of Economics 13 Dez. 2023
Edition:This version: December, 2023
Series:AWI discussion paper series no. 740 (December 2023)
In: AWI discussion paper series (no. 740 (December 2023))

DOI:10.11588/heidok.00034166
Subjects:
Online Access:Verlag, kostenfrei: https://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/volltextserver/34166/7/Bell_Rural_Roads_dp740_2023.pdf
Resolving-System, kostenfrei: https://doi.org/10.11588/heidok.00034166
Resolving-System, kostenfrei: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bsz:16-heidok-341665
Langzeitarchivierung Nationalbibliothek, kostenfrei: https://d-nb.info/1313295841/34
Verlag, kostenfrei: http://www.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/archiv/34166
Resolving-System, kostenfrei: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/283476
Get full text
Author Notes:Clive Bell
Description
Summary:Do 'local' methods of evaluation, such as partial equilibrium analysis at market prices or estimation of shadow prices, provide reliable assessments of a large rural roads programme's social profitability? Consider a small open economy with one city and a rural hinterland, two traded goods, two non-tradables, two specific factors and mobile labour. The wage in some urban employment is regulated. Revenue is raised by a tariff or an excise on the imported good. Theory and model calibration with numerical examples establish that local methods perform rather dismally. With the equivalent variation yielded by general equilibrium analysis as benchmark, the first-order partial equilibrium method grossly underestimates a programme's net benefit. Shadow prices derived on the assumption that all economic activity takes place at the border - a wholesale neglect of space - yield absurd underestimates. Two spatially sensitive variants of shadow pricing fall well short of remedying them.
Physical Description:Online Resource
DOI:10.11588/heidok.00034166