The relationship between ambivalence towards supervisor's behavior and employee’s mental health

Ambivalence in social interactions has been linked to health-related outcomes in private relationships and recent research has started to expand this evidence to ambivalent leadership at the workplace by showing that ambivalent supervisor-employee relationships are related to higher stress levels in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Herr, Raphael (VerfasserIn) , Birmingham, Wendy C. (VerfasserIn) , van Harreveld, Frenk (VerfasserIn) , van Vianen, Annelies E. M. (VerfasserIn) , Fischer, Joachim E. (VerfasserIn) , Bosch, Jos A. (VerfasserIn)
Dokumenttyp: Article (Journal)
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 10 June 2022
In: Scientific reports
Year: 2022, Jahrgang: 12, Pages: 1-9
ISSN:2045-2322
DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-13533-2
Online-Zugang:Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13533-2
Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: http://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-13533-2
Volltext
Verfasserangaben:Raphael M. Herr, Wendy C. Birmingham, Frenk van Harreveld, Annelies E.M. van Vianen, Joachim E. Fischer and Jos A. Bosch
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Ambivalence in social interactions has been linked to health-related outcomes in private relationships and recent research has started to expand this evidence to ambivalent leadership at the workplace by showing that ambivalent supervisor-employee relationships are related to higher stress levels in employees. However, the mental health consequences of ambivalent leadership have not been examined yet. Using a multilevel approach, this study estimated associations of ambivalent leadership with mental health indicators (depression, anxiety, vital exhaustion, fatigue) in 993 employees from 27 work groups. A total effect of ambivalent leadership was found for all four mental health measures, as well as within-group and between-group effects. The consistent relationships of ambivalent leadership with higher symptoms of mental ill-health at the individual- (i.e., within-group) and the group-level (i.e., between-group) support the existence of an un-confounded association, as well as group effects of collective ambivalence.
Beschreibung:Gesehen am 16.01.2024
Beschreibung:Online Resource
ISSN:2045-2322
DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-13533-2