Association of open-plan offices and sick leave: a systematic review and meta-analysis: review article

We aimed to systematically review and meta-analyze the association of employees working in various kinds of open-plan offices with sick leave data, compared to those working in traditional cell offices. Databases of PubMed, PubPsych, and Psyndex were systematically searched following the PRISMA stat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Mauss, Daniel (VerfasserIn) , Jarczok, Marc N. (VerfasserIn) , Genser, Bernd (VerfasserIn) , Herr, Raphael (VerfasserIn)
Dokumenttyp: Article (Journal)
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: June 03, 2023
In: Industrial health
Year: 2023, Jahrgang: 61, Heft: 3, Pages: 173-183
ISSN:1880-8026
DOI:10.2486/indhealth.2022-0053
Online-Zugang:Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.2022-0053
Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/indhealth/61/3/61_2022-0053/_article
Volltext
Verfasserangaben:Daniel Mauss, Marc N Jarczok, Bernd Genser and Raphael Herr
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We aimed to systematically review and meta-analyze the association of employees working in various kinds of open-plan offices with sick leave data, compared to those working in traditional cell offices. Databases of PubMed, PubPsych, and Psyndex were systematically searched following the PRISMA statement. Pooled summary estimates of odds ratio (OR) were calculated comparing sick leave of employees in cell offices with those working in small open-plan offices (4-9 people), and those in various open-plan office solutions (≥4 people). We used Forest plots visualizing study-specific estimates and the pooled fixed and random effects estimators. Five studies were identified (2008-2020) with a total of 13,277 (range 469-6,328) participants. Compared with employees working in cell offices, those working in small open-plan offices were associated with higher odds of sick leave days (OR=1.27; 95% CI 0.99-1.54; p=0.046) as well as those working in various kinds of open-plan offices with ≥4 colleagues (OR=1.24; 95% CI 0.96-1.51; p=0.004). Our results are consistent with those of earlier reviews focusing on other effects of open-plan office solutions such as health and well-being. Different solutions for office design and architectural lay-out should be the focus of future studies to balance pros and cons of open-plan offices.
Beschreibung:Online Vorveröffentlichung: 9. Juni, 2022
Gesehen am 31.01.2024
Beschreibung:Online Resource
ISSN:1880-8026
DOI:10.2486/indhealth.2022-0053