In vitro comparison of two electromagnetic shockwave generators: low-pressure wide focus vs high-pressure small focus: impact on initial stone fragmentation and final stone comminution

Context: Recently developed concepts for higher efficacy extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy with low-pressure wide focus systems resulting in finer fragmentation of the calculi. - Objective: To compare two different electromagnetic shockwave sources (low-pressure wide focus [Xinin Lithotripter, XL...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Rassweiler, Jens (VerfasserIn) , Rieker, Philip (VerfasserIn) , Pecha, Rainer (VerfasserIn) , Dressel, Martin (VerfasserIn) , Rassweiler-Seyfried, Marie-Claire (VerfasserIn)
Dokumenttyp: Article (Journal)
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 1 February 2022
In: Journal of endourology
Year: 2022, Jahrgang: 36, Heft: 2, Pages: 266-272
ISSN:1557-900X
DOI:10.1089/end.2021.0416
Online-Zugang:Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2021.0416
Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: http://www.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/end.2021.0416
Volltext
Verfasserangaben:Jens Rassweiler, Philip Rieker, Rainer Pecha, Martin Dressel, and Marie-Claire Rassweiler-Seyfried

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1888537892
003 DE-627
005 20240703175815.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 240514s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1089/end.2021.0416  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1888537892 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1888537892 
035 |a (OCoLC)1443675755 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 33  |2 sdnb 
100 1 |a Rassweiler, Jens  |d 1955-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1067480307  |0 (DE-627)818791225  |0 (DE-576)426692713  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a In vitro comparison of two electromagnetic shockwave generators: low-pressure wide focus vs high-pressure small focus  |b impact on initial stone fragmentation and final stone comminution  |c Jens Rassweiler, Philip Rieker, Rainer Pecha, Martin Dressel, and Marie-Claire Rassweiler-Seyfried 
246 3 3 |a In vitro comparison of two electromagnetic shockwave generators: low-pressure wide focus versus high-pressure small focus 
264 1 |c 1 February 2022 
300 |a 7 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Gesehen am 24.04.2024 
520 |a Context: Recently developed concepts for higher efficacy extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy with low-pressure wide focus systems resulting in finer fragmentation of the calculi. - Objective: To compare two different electromagnetic shockwave sources (low-pressure wide focus [Xinin Lithotripter, XL] vs high-pressure small focus [Siemens Lithoskop, SL]) by sound field measurements and in vitro fragmentation. - Evidence Acquisition: The CS-2012A XX-ES lithotripter (self-focusing electromagnetic shockwave generator with concave spherical curved electrical coil; XL) was compared to the (SL) (electromagnetic generator with a flat electric coil with an acoustical lens). Different sound field measurements were performed using a fiber-optic hydrophone. Measurements at three different power settings (XL: 8.0, 9.3, and 10.3 kV and SL: Level 1, 5, and 8). Ten AST stones and 15 BegoStones (9.3 kV, Level 3) with a frequency of 90/minute (SL) and 20/minute (XL). Number of impulses to the first crack and for complete stone comminution (residual fragments <2 mm) was documented. - Results: The median number of shockwaves for the first crack in AST stones with the XL was 12 (10-14) and 7 with the SL (6-9). Complete disintegration was accomplished after 815 (782-824) shockwaves with XL and 702 (688-712) with SL. The difference was not statistically significant. The median number of shockwaves to produce the first crack in BegoStones was 524 (504-542) with XL and only 151 (137-161) with SL. Numbers of shockwaves for complete disintegration did not differ significantly (XL: 2518 vs SL: 2287). Using a wide focus with low pressure shows more homogeneous disintegration. - Conclusion: Two stone models showed significant differences regarding form and time of the initial fragmentation. Impulses for stone comminution did not differ significantly. The advantages of a low-pressure wide-focus system include minimal trauma and a homogeneous fragment size but is more time consuming. High-pressure small-focus systems are clinically effective. 
700 1 |a Rieker, Philip  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1237001315  |0 (DE-627)176285645X  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Pecha, Rainer  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Dressel, Martin  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Rassweiler-Seyfried, Marie-Claire  |d 1986-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1030330050  |0 (DE-627)735084637  |0 (DE-576)37812871X  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of endourology  |d Larchmont, NY : Liebert, 1999  |g 36(2022), 2, Seite 266-272  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)32482288X  |w (DE-600)2030846-2  |w (DE-576)252074459  |x 1557-900X  |7 nnas  |a In vitro comparison of two electromagnetic shockwave generators: low-pressure wide focus vs high-pressure small focus impact on initial stone fragmentation and final stone comminution 
773 1 8 |g volume:36  |g year:2022  |g number:2  |g pages:266-272  |g extent:7  |a In vitro comparison of two electromagnetic shockwave generators: low-pressure wide focus vs high-pressure small focus impact on initial stone fragmentation and final stone comminution 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2021.0416  |x Verlag  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u http://www.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/end.2021.0416  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
992 |a 20240514 
993 |a Article 
994 |a 2022 
998 |g 1030330050  |a Rassweiler-Seyfried, Marie-Claire  |m 1030330050:Rassweiler-Seyfried, Marie-Claire  |d 60000  |d 63100  |e 60000PR1030330050  |e 63100PR1030330050  |k 0/60000/  |k 1/60000/63100/  |p 5  |y j 
998 |g 1237001315  |a Rieker, Philip  |m 1237001315:Rieker, Philip  |d 60000  |e 60000PR1237001315  |k 0/60000/  |p 2 
998 |g 1067480307  |a Rassweiler, Jens  |m 1067480307:Rassweiler, Jens  |d 60000  |e 60000PR1067480307  |k 0/60000/  |p 1  |x j 
999 |a KXP-PPN1888537892  |e 4522843801 
BIB |a Y 
SER |a journal 
JSO |a {"person":[{"family":"Rassweiler","display":"Rassweiler, Jens","roleDisplay":"VerfasserIn","given":"Jens","role":"aut"},{"roleDisplay":"VerfasserIn","given":"Philip","role":"aut","display":"Rieker, Philip","family":"Rieker"},{"role":"aut","given":"Rainer","roleDisplay":"VerfasserIn","display":"Pecha, Rainer","family":"Pecha"},{"role":"aut","roleDisplay":"VerfasserIn","given":"Martin","display":"Dressel, Martin","family":"Dressel"},{"family":"Rassweiler-Seyfried","display":"Rassweiler-Seyfried, Marie-Claire","role":"aut","roleDisplay":"VerfasserIn","given":"Marie-Claire"}],"physDesc":[{"extent":"7 S."}],"type":{"media":"Online-Ressource","bibl":"article-journal"},"recId":"1888537892","relHost":[{"pubHistory":["1.1987 -"],"physDesc":[{"extent":"Online-Ressource"}],"title":[{"title":"Journal of endourology","title_sort":"Journal of endourology"}],"origin":[{"dateIssuedKey":"1999","publisherPlace":"Larchmont, NY","publisher":"Liebert","dateIssuedDisp":"1999-"}],"disp":"In vitro comparison of two electromagnetic shockwave generators: low-pressure wide focus vs high-pressure small focus impact on initial stone fragmentation and final stone comminutionJournal of endourology","type":{"bibl":"periodical","media":"Online-Ressource"},"recId":"32482288X","language":["eng"],"part":{"issue":"2","text":"36(2022), 2, Seite 266-272","pages":"266-272","year":"2022","volume":"36","extent":"7"},"id":{"issn":["1557-900X"],"eki":["32482288X"],"zdb":["2030846-2"]}}],"id":{"eki":["1888537892"],"doi":["10.1089/end.2021.0416"]},"note":["Gesehen am 24.04.2024"],"title":[{"title":"In vitro comparison of two electromagnetic shockwave generators: low-pressure wide focus vs high-pressure small focus","title_sort":"In vitro comparison of two electromagnetic shockwave generators: low-pressure wide focus vs high-pressure small focus","subtitle":"impact on initial stone fragmentation and final stone comminution"}],"titleAlt":[{"title":"In vitro comparison of two electromagnetic shockwave generators: low-pressure wide focus versus high-pressure small focus"}],"origin":[{"dateIssuedKey":"2022","dateIssuedDisp":"1 February 2022"}],"name":{"displayForm":["Jens Rassweiler, Philip Rieker, Rainer Pecha, Martin Dressel, and Marie-Claire Rassweiler-Seyfried"]},"language":["eng"]} 
SRT |a RASSWEILERINVITROCOM1202