Forensic medical examination after sexual violence: implications based on victims’ perceptions

Background/Aim: The objective of this study was to assess the perception of the forensic medical examination (FME) by victims of sexual violence. Based on patient-related outcomes gained in terms of personnel, chronological and spatial parameters, an additional aim was to derive improved examination...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Berger, Laura (VerfasserIn) , Tuschy, Benjamin (VerfasserIn) , Stefanovic, Stefan (VerfasserIn) , Yen, Kathrin (VerfasserIn) , Weiß, Christel (VerfasserIn) , Sütterlin, Marc (VerfasserIn) , Spaich, Saskia (VerfasserIn) , Berlit, Sebastian (VerfasserIn)
Dokumenttyp: Article (Journal)
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: March-April 2023
In: In vivo
Year: 2023, Jahrgang: 37, Heft: 2, Pages: 848-857
ISSN:1791-7549
DOI:10.21873/invivo.13152
Online-Zugang:Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.13152
Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://iv.iiarjournals.org/content/37/2/848
Volltext
Verfasserangaben:Laura Berger, Benjamin Tuschy, Stefan Stefanovic, Kathrin Yen, Christel Weiss, Marc Sütterlin, Saskia Spaich and Sebastian Berlit
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background/Aim: The objective of this study was to assess the perception of the forensic medical examination (FME) by victims of sexual violence. Based on patient-related outcomes gained in terms of personnel, chronological and spatial parameters, an additional aim was to derive improved examination procedures. Patients and Methods: A total of 49 sexually assaulted women were enrolled in this study. After standardized FME by a forensic doctor followed by a gynecologist, women were asked to complete a questionnaire addressing general perception, preferences regarding attending staff’s sex, sequence and time frame of the examinations performed. The attending gynecologist also completed a questionnaire addressing demographic and medical parameters of the patient as well as assault-related information. Results: The examination setting in general was evaluated positively. Nevertheless, 52% of examined victims perceived the FME as an additional psychological burden. Overall, 85% of the affected women preferred a female forensic physician and 76% a female gynecologist to perform the examination. When women said they experienced a violation of their privacy during the gynecological examination, a male was more often present (60% vs. 35%, p=0.0866). Regarding the sequence of the examination components, 65% of the victims preferred to start with their medical history followed by the forensic and then the gynecological examination. Conclusion: Forensic medical and gynecological examination after sexual assault is an essential procedure, yet it is a potentially further traumatizing experience for the victim. The identified patient preferences should be taken into account in order to diminish further trauma.
Beschreibung:Gesehen am 22.05.2024
Beschreibung:Online Resource
ISSN:1791-7549
DOI:10.21873/invivo.13152