Trial of labor after caesarean section in low risk pregnancies: is it risky?

Purpose: To evaluate the influence of a previous caesarean section on adverse composite maternal and perinatal outcome in women who attempted a trial of labor. Methods: This historical cohort study analyzed maternal and perinatal outcome in women with otherwise low risk pregnancies at term who under...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Kehl, Sven (VerfasserIn) , Düster, Hanna (VerfasserIn) , Weiß, Christel (VerfasserIn) , Bader, Simon (VerfasserIn) , Schneider, Michael (VerfasserIn) , Beckmann, Matthias W. (VerfasserIn) , Dammer, Ulf (VerfasserIn) , Pretscher, Jutta (VerfasserIn)
Dokumenttyp: Article (Journal)
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 29 August 2024
In: Archives of gynecology and obstetrics
Year: 2025, Jahrgang: 311, Heft: 4, Pages: 965-971
ISSN:1432-0711
DOI:10.1007/s00404-024-07700-1
Online-Zugang:Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-024-07700-1
Volltext
Verfasserangaben:Sven Kehl, Hanna Düster, Christel Weiss, Simon Bader, Michael Schneider, Matthias W. Beckmann, Ulf Dammer, Jutta Pretscher
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose: To evaluate the influence of a previous caesarean section on adverse composite maternal and perinatal outcome in women who attempted a trial of labor. Methods: This historical cohort study analyzed maternal and perinatal outcome in women with otherwise low risk pregnancies at term who underwent a trial of labor after a caesarean section (TOLAC). The primary outcome measure was the adverse composite outcome. Secondary outcome measures were amongst others the caesarean section rate and the mode of vaginal delivery. Results: The adverse composite outcome was more frequently in the previous caesarean section group compared to women with no previous caesarean Sect. (22.3% vs. 15.6%, p < 0.0001). The percentage of caesarean Sect. (15.4% vs. 8.2%, p < 0,0001), uterine rupture (1.0% vs. 0.02%, p < 0.0001), placental abruption (1.1% vs. 0.3%, p = 0.0014), vaginal operative delivery (16.0% vs. 8.6%, p < 0.0001), pH < 7.10 (3.7% vs. 2.5%, p = 0.0151), base excess < -12 (3.2% vs. 2.2%, p = 0.0297), abnormal cardiotocography (22.5% vs. 13.9%, p < 0,0001) and fetal blood analysis (6.2% vs. 2.6%, p < 0.0001) was significantly higher in women with a previous caesarean section. Taking the parity into account, these differences could only been seen in women without a previous vaginal delivery. In parous women with a previous vaginal delivery and a caesarean section in history, the adverse composite did not differ between the groups. Only the rate of pH < 7.1 was higher in women after a caesarean Sect. (4.5% vs. 1.8%, p = 0.0436). Conclusion: Trial of labor after caesarean in otherwise low risk pregnancies is associated with a higher rate of complications especially if there is no history of vaginal delivery.
Beschreibung:Gesehen am 20.09.2024
Beschreibung:Online Resource
ISSN:1432-0711
DOI:10.1007/s00404-024-07700-1