Attributes, methods, and frameworks used to evaluate wearables and their companion mHealth apps: scoping review : review

Background: Wearable devices, mobile technologies, and their combination have been accepted into clinical use to better assess the physical fitness and quality of life of patients and as preventive measures. Usability is pivotal for overcoming constraints and gaining users’ acceptance of technology...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Moorthy, Preetha (Author) , Weinert, Lina (Author) , Schüttler, Christina (Author) , Svensson, Laura (Author) , Sedlmayr, Brita (Author) , Müller, Julia (Author) , Nagelschmidt, Till (Author)
Format: Article (Journal)
Language:English
Published: 5.4.2024
In: JMIR mhealth and uhealth
Year: 2024, Volume: 12, Issue: 1, Pages: 1-23
ISSN:2291-5222
DOI:10.2196/52179
Online Access:Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.2196/52179
Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://mhealth.jmir.org/2024/1/e52179
Get full text
Author Notes:Preetha Moorthy, MSc; Lina Weinert, MSc; Christina Schüttler, PhD; Laura Svensson, MSc; Brita Sedlmayr, PhD; Julia Müller, MSc; Till Nagel, PhD

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a2200000 c 4500
001 1906375437
003 DE-627
005 20250403154219.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 241022s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.2196/52179  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1906375437 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1906375437 
035 |a (OCoLC)1475316459 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 33  |2 sdnb 
100 1 |a Moorthy, Preetha  |d 1989-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1283683288  |0 (DE-627)1839512504  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Attributes, methods, and frameworks used to evaluate wearables and their companion mHealth apps  |b scoping review : review  |c Preetha Moorthy, MSc; Lina Weinert, MSc; Christina Schüttler, PhD; Laura Svensson, MSc; Brita Sedlmayr, PhD; Julia Müller, MSc; Till Nagel, PhD 
264 1 |c 5.4.2024 
300 |a 23 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Gesehen am 22.10.2024 
520 |a Background: Wearable devices, mobile technologies, and their combination have been accepted into clinical use to better assess the physical fitness and quality of life of patients and as preventive measures. Usability is pivotal for overcoming constraints and gaining users’ acceptance of technology such as wearables and their companion mobile health (mHealth) apps. However, owing to limitations in design and evaluation, interactive wearables and mHealth apps have often been restricted from their full potential. - Objective: This study aims to identify studies that have incorporated wearable devices and determine their frequency of use in conjunction with mHealth apps or their combination. Specifically, this study aims to understand the attributes and evaluation techniques used to evaluate usability in the health care domain for these technologies and their combinations. - Methods: We conducted an extensive search across 4 electronic databases, spanning the last 30 years up to December 2021. Studies including the keywords “wearable devices,” “mobile apps,” “mHealth apps,” “physiological data,” “usability,” “user experience,” and “user evaluation” were considered for inclusion. A team of 5 reviewers screened the collected publications and charted the features based on the research questions. Subsequently, we categorized these characteristics following existing usability and wearable taxonomies. We applied a methodological framework for scoping reviews and the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist. - Results: A total of 382 reports were identified from the search strategy, and 68 articles were included. Most of the studies (57/68, 84%) involved the simultaneous use of wearables and connected mobile apps. Wrist-worn commercial consumer devices such as wristbands were the most prevalent, accounting for 66% (45/68) of the wearables identified in our review. Approximately half of the data from the medical domain (32/68, 47%) focused on studies involving participants with chronic illnesses or disorders. Overall, 29 usability attributes were identified, and 5 attributes were frequently used for evaluation: satisfaction (34/68, 50%), ease of use (27/68, 40%), user experience (16/68, 24%), perceived usefulness (18/68, 26%), and effectiveness (15/68, 22%). Only 10% (7/68) of the studies used a user- or human-centered design paradigm for usability evaluation. - Conclusions: Our scoping review identified the types and categories of wearable devices and mHealth apps, their frequency of use in studies, and their implementation in the medical context. In addition, we examined the usability evaluation of these technologies: methods, attributes, and frameworks. Within the array of available wearables and mHealth apps, health care providers encounter the challenge of selecting devices and companion apps that are effective, user-friendly, and compatible with user interactions. The current gap in usability and user experience in health care research limits our understanding of the strengths and limitations of wearable technologies and their companion apps. Additional research is necessary to overcome these limitations. 
700 1 |a Weinert, Lina  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1266908358  |0 (DE-627)1815632771  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Schüttler, Christina  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1177172844  |0 (DE-627)1048601595  |0 (DE-576)517316277  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Svensson, Laura  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1266911154  |0 (DE-627)1815636963  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Sedlmayr, Brita  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1127564218  |0 (DE-627)881980471  |0 (DE-576)485258153  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Müller, Julia  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1266906894  |0 (DE-627)1815592087  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Nagelschmidt, Till  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1354055756  |0 (DE-627)1915378079  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t JMIR mhealth and uhealth  |d Toronto : JMIR Publications, 2013  |g 12(2024), 1, Artikel-ID e52179, Seite 1-23  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)749502282  |w (DE-600)2719220-9  |w (DE-576)383521165  |x 2291-5222  |7 nnas  |a Attributes, methods, and frameworks used to evaluate wearables and their companion mHealth apps scoping review : review 
773 1 8 |g volume:12  |g year:2024  |g number:1  |g elocationid:e52179  |g pages:1-23  |g extent:23  |a Attributes, methods, and frameworks used to evaluate wearables and their companion mHealth apps scoping review : review 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.2196/52179  |x Verlag  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://mhealth.jmir.org/2024/1/e52179  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
992 |a 20241022 
993 |a Article 
994 |a 2024 
998 |g 1266911154  |a Svensson, Laura  |m 1266911154:Svensson, Laura  |d 910000  |e 910000PS1266911154  |k 0/910000/  |p 4 
998 |g 1266908358  |a Weinert, Lina  |m 1266908358:Weinert, Lina  |d 910000  |d 912800  |e 910000PW1266908358  |e 912800PW1266908358  |k 0/910000/  |k 1/910000/912800/  |p 2 
998 |g 1283683288  |a Moorthy, Preetha  |m 1283683288:Moorthy, Preetha  |d 60000  |d 65300  |e 60000PM1283683288  |e 65300PM1283683288  |k 0/60000/  |k 1/60000/65300/  |p 1  |x j 
999 |a KXP-PPN1906375437  |e 4600730690 
BIB |a Y 
SER |a journal 
JSO |a {"name":{"displayForm":["Preetha Moorthy, MSc; Lina Weinert, MSc; Christina Schüttler, PhD; Laura Svensson, MSc; Brita Sedlmayr, PhD; Julia Müller, MSc; Till Nagel, PhD"]},"relHost":[{"language":["eng"],"part":{"pages":"1-23","volume":"12","extent":"23","issue":"1","year":"2024","text":"12(2024), 1, Artikel-ID e52179, Seite 1-23"},"physDesc":[{"extent":"Online-Ressource"}],"disp":"Attributes, methods, and frameworks used to evaluate wearables and their companion mHealth apps scoping review : reviewJMIR mhealth and uhealth","titleAlt":[{"title":"JMU"}],"recId":"749502282","id":{"eki":["749502282"],"issn":["2291-5222"],"zdb":["2719220-9"]},"origin":[{"dateIssuedDisp":"2013-","publisher":"JMIR Publications","publisherPlace":"Toronto","dateIssuedKey":"2013"}],"type":{"bibl":"periodical","media":"Online-Ressource"},"pubHistory":["1.2013 -"],"title":[{"title":"JMIR mhealth and uhealth","title_sort":"JMIR mhealth and uhealth"}]}],"recId":"1906375437","id":{"eki":["1906375437"],"doi":["10.2196/52179"]},"language":["eng"],"physDesc":[{"extent":"23 S."}],"origin":[{"dateIssuedDisp":"5.4.2024","dateIssuedKey":"2024"}],"type":{"media":"Online-Ressource","bibl":"article-journal"},"person":[{"given":"Preetha","family":"Moorthy","display":"Moorthy, Preetha","role":"aut"},{"role":"aut","given":"Lina","family":"Weinert","display":"Weinert, Lina"},{"role":"aut","display":"Schüttler, Christina","given":"Christina","family":"Schüttler"},{"role":"aut","display":"Svensson, Laura","family":"Svensson","given":"Laura"},{"role":"aut","display":"Sedlmayr, Brita","given":"Brita","family":"Sedlmayr"},{"role":"aut","display":"Müller, Julia","given":"Julia","family":"Müller"},{"role":"aut","family":"Nagelschmidt","given":"Till","display":"Nagelschmidt, Till"}],"title":[{"title_sort":"Attributes, methods, and frameworks used to evaluate wearables and their companion mHealth apps","subtitle":"scoping review : review","title":"Attributes, methods, and frameworks used to evaluate wearables and their companion mHealth apps"}],"note":["Gesehen am 22.10.2024"]} 
SRT |a MOORTHYPREATTRIBUTES5420