Comparison between endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial node biopsy and transbronchial needle aspiration: a meta-analysis
Introduction: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) can be limited by the inadequacy of intact tissues, especially in patients with lymphoma, sarcoidosis, and lymph node tuberculosis. A novel technique called transbronchial node biopsy (TBNB) by forceps or cryo...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article (Journal) |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
December 2024
|
| In: |
Respiration
Year: 2024, Volume: 103, Issue: 12, Pages: 752-764 |
| ISSN: | 1423-0356 |
| DOI: | 10.1159/000540859 |
| Online Access: | Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1159/000540859 Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://karger.com/res/article-abstract/103/12/752/911827/Comparison-between-Endobronchial-Ultrasound-Guided?redirectedFrom=fulltext |
| Author Notes: | Wuchen Yang, Huizhen Yang, Quncheng Zhang, Felix J.F. Herth, Xiaoju Zhang |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1925744302 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20250717014058.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 250515s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1159/000540859 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1925744302 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1925744302 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1528045469 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 33 |2 sdnb | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Yang, Wuchen |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1365710181 |0 (DE-627)1925745325 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Comparison between endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial node biopsy and transbronchial needle aspiration |b a meta-analysis |c Wuchen Yang, Huizhen Yang, Quncheng Zhang, Felix J.F. Herth, Xiaoju Zhang |
| 264 | 1 | |c December 2024 | |
| 300 | |a 13 | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Online verfügbar: 13. August 2024 | ||
| 500 | |a Gesehen am 15.05.2025 | ||
| 520 | |a Introduction: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) can be limited by the inadequacy of intact tissues, especially in patients with lymphoma, sarcoidosis, and lymph node tuberculosis. A novel technique called transbronchial node biopsy (TBNB) by forceps or cryoprobe has been proposed and studied to improve specimen quality and diagnostic yield. We performed a systematic review of studies describing the safety and sensitivity of EBUS-TBNB versus EBUS-TBNA in diagnosing intrathoracic lymphadenopathy/masses. Methods: We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure to identify studies focusing on the application of EBUS-TBNB for diagnosis of intrathoracic lymphadenopathy. The quality of each study was evaluated using the QUADAS-2 tool. Using inverse-variance (I-V) weighting, we performed a meta-analysis of diagnostic yield estimations. We also reviewed the complications related to the procedure. Results: Thirteen studies were included in the final analysis. The meta-analysis yielded a pooled overall diagnostic yield of 77.80% (939/1,207) for EBUS-TBNA and 86.01% (834/958) for EBUS-TBNB, with an inverse-variance-weighted odds ratio of 3.13 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.61-6.01; p = 0.0008) and I2 of 82%. The pooled diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNB versus EBUS-TBNA for the diagnosis of malignancy (including primary lung cancer and extrapulmonary malignancy) was 84.53% (590/698) for EBUS-TBNA and 90.84% (476/524) for EBUS-TBNB, with an I-V-weighted OR of 2.33 (95% CI, 1.15-4.74; p = 0.02) and I2 of 64%. The pooled diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNB versus EBUS-TBNA for the diagnosis of benignancy was 71.19% (252/354) for EBUS-TBNA and 86.62% (233/269) for EBUS-TBNB, with an I-V-weighted OR of 4.39 (95% CI, 2.00-9.65; p = 0.002) and I2 of 59%. The overall complications included bleeding (n = 11, 0.90%), pneumomediastinum (n = 6, 0.49%), pneumothorax (n = 6, 0.49%), pneumonia (n = 4, 0.33%), respiratory failure (n = 1, 0.08%), and haemoptysis (n = 1, 0.08%). The funnel plot analysis illustrated no major publication bias. Conclusions: EBUS-TBNB improves the overall diagnostic yield of sampling intrathoracic lymphadenopathy and mass lesions relative to EBUS-TBNA. The complication rate of EBUS-TBNB is higher than that of EBUS-TBNA but reportedly lower than that of surgical biopsies. | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Yang, Huizhen |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1222925915 |0 (DE-627)1742191843 |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Zhang, Quncheng |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1336231440 |0 (DE-627)1895888476 |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Herth, Felix |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1016095236 |0 (DE-627)705477568 |0 (DE-576)351509925 |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Zhang, Xiaoju |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Respiration |d Basel : Karger, 1968 |g 103(2024), 12 vom: Dez., Seite 752-764 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)26551035X |w (DE-600)1464419-8 |w (DE-576)112815111 |x 1423-0356 |7 nnas |a Comparison between endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial node biopsy and transbronchial needle aspiration a meta-analysis |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:103 |g year:2024 |g number:12 |g month:12 |g pages:752-764 |g extent:13 |a Comparison between endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial node biopsy and transbronchial needle aspiration a meta-analysis |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1159/000540859 |x Verlag |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://karger.com/res/article-abstract/103/12/752/911827/Comparison-between-Endobronchial-Ultrasound-Guided?redirectedFrom=fulltext |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 992 | |a 20250515 | ||
| 993 | |a Article | ||
| 994 | |a 2024 | ||
| 998 | |g 1016095236 |a Herth, Felix |m 1016095236:Herth, Felix |d 50000 |d 910000 |d 950000 |d 950900 |e 50000PH1016095236 |e 910000PH1016095236 |e 950000PH1016095236 |e 950900PH1016095236 |k 0/50000/ |k 0/910000/ |k 1/910000/950000/ |k 2/910000/950000/950900/ |p 4 | ||
| 999 | |a KXP-PPN1925744302 |e 4724737905 | ||
| BIB | |a Y | ||
| SER | |a journal | ||
| JSO | |a {"physDesc":[{"extent":"13 S."}],"recId":"1925744302","relHost":[{"pubHistory":["Vol. 25, no. 1 (1968)-"],"origin":[{"dateIssuedKey":"1968","publisherPlace":"Basel","dateIssuedDisp":"1968-","publisher":"Karger"}],"note":["Gesehen am 03.07.2024"],"type":{"bibl":"periodical","media":"Online-Ressource"},"language":["eng"],"part":{"pages":"752-764","text":"103(2024), 12 vom: Dez., Seite 752-764","extent":"13","issue":"12","year":"2024","volume":"103"},"title":[{"title":"Respiration","title_sort":"Respiration","subtitle":"international journal of thoracic medicine"}],"id":{"zdb":["1464419-8"],"issn":["1423-0356"],"eki":["26551035X"]},"physDesc":[{"extent":"Online-Ressource"}],"recId":"26551035X","disp":"Comparison between endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial node biopsy and transbronchial needle aspiration a meta-analysisRespiration"}],"person":[{"display":"Yang, Wuchen","family":"Yang","given":"Wuchen","role":"aut"},{"family":"Yang","role":"aut","given":"Huizhen","display":"Yang, Huizhen"},{"display":"Zhang, Quncheng","family":"Zhang","role":"aut","given":"Quncheng"},{"display":"Herth, Felix","family":"Herth","given":"Felix","role":"aut"},{"display":"Zhang, Xiaoju","given":"Xiaoju","role":"aut","family":"Zhang"}],"origin":[{"dateIssuedKey":"2024","dateIssuedDisp":"December 2024"}],"note":["Online verfügbar: 13. August 2024","Gesehen am 15.05.2025"],"language":["eng"],"type":{"media":"Online-Ressource","bibl":"article-journal"},"title":[{"subtitle":"a meta-analysis","title_sort":"Comparison between endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial node biopsy and transbronchial needle aspiration","title":"Comparison between endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial node biopsy and transbronchial needle aspiration"}],"name":{"displayForm":["Wuchen Yang, Huizhen Yang, Quncheng Zhang, Felix J.F. Herth, Xiaoju Zhang"]},"id":{"doi":["10.1159/000540859"],"eki":["1925744302"]}} | ||
| SRT | |a YANGWUCHENCOMPARISON2024 | ||