German validation of three ethics questionnaires: consequentialist scale, ethical standards of judgment questionnaire, and revised ethics position questionnaire

Introduction The Consequentialist Scale (CS) and the Ethical Standards of Judgment Questionnaire (ESJQ) are instruments developed to evaluate the extent of moral reasoning in relation to the two pivotal factors that appear to influence moral decision-making: the degree of harm or benefit produced by...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Teichmann, Birgit (Author) , Melchior, Florian (Author) , Kosteletos, George (Author)
Format: Article (Journal)
Language:English
Published: May 2, 2025
In: PLOS ONE
Year: 2025, Volume: 20, Issue: 5, Pages: 1-22
ISSN:1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0319937
Online Access:Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0319937
Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0319937
Get full text
Author Notes:Birgit Teichmann, Florian Melchior, George Kosteletos

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a2200000 c 4500
001 1939495253
003 DE-627
005 20251028091256.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 251027s2025 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1371/journal.pone.0319937  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1939495253 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1939495253 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 33  |2 sdnb 
100 1 |a Teichmann, Birgit  |d 1963-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)120000989  |0 (DE-627)696289423  |0 (DE-576)291989357  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a German validation of three ethics questionnaires  |b consequentialist scale, ethical standards of judgment questionnaire, and revised ethics position questionnaire  |c Birgit Teichmann, Florian Melchior, George Kosteletos 
264 1 |c May 2, 2025 
300 |b Illustrationen 
300 |a 22 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Gesehen am 27.10.2025 
520 |a Introduction The Consequentialist Scale (CS) and the Ethical Standards of Judgment Questionnaire (ESJQ) are instruments developed to evaluate the extent of moral reasoning in relation to the two pivotal factors that appear to influence moral decision-making: the degree of harm or benefit produced by the action in question and the consistency of the action with moral norms. In other words, they assess the propensity to utilitarian versus deontological moral reasoning. In contrast, the Ethical Position Questionnaire (EPQ-5) conceptualizes ethical idealism and ethical relativism as meaning-independent, orthogonal dimensions. This study aimed to assess the psychometric properties of German versions of the three mentioned scales in a sample of native German speakers. Methods A convenience sample of 263 participants completed the online survey. Analyses included internal consistency, structural validity, construct validity through the known-groups method, retest-reliability with a subgroup of n = 102, and floor and ceiling effects. This study used the STROBE checklist. Results The CS and EPQ-5 showed strong psychometric properties without any noticeable weaknesses. In contrast, the ESJQ displayed significant shortcomings across all analyses, with low internal consistency and poor results in both item analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. The results indicated that deontology, formalism, and idealism were positively correlated with age, while only idealism correlated significantly with gender, with females scoring higher on the idealism scale. A positive correlation was observed between deontology and formalism with religiosity. With regard to personality, deontology and idealism demonstrated a positive correlation with conscientiousness, whereas utilitarianism exhibited a negative correlation with conscientiousness. A positive correlation between consequentialism and openness was also identified, while a negative correlation between formalism and agreeableness was evident. Conclusion The German versions of the CS and EPQ-5 are reliable and valid instruments for measuring the propensity toward utilitarian and deontological approaches, as well as ethical idealism and relativism. The scales, therefore, serve as invaluable tools for research, training, and professional practice, facilitating comprehension of the aspects of conscious reflection on ethical dilemmas in practice and of responsible action. The ESJQ, however, did not perform well psychometrically in the German translation, as its internal consistency is questionable. 
650 4 |a Decision making 
650 4 |a German people 
650 4 |a Moral philosophy 
650 4 |a Professions 
650 4 |a Psychometrics 
650 4 |a Questionnaires 
650 4 |a Religion 
650 4 |a Research ethics 
700 1 |a Melchior, Florian  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1280837802  |0 (DE-627)1834616530  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Kosteletos, George  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1379981956  |0 (DE-627)1939497272  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t PLOS ONE  |d San Francisco, California, US : PLOS, 2006  |g 20(2025), 5, Artikel-ID e0319937, Seite 1-22  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)523574592  |w (DE-600)2267670-3  |w (DE-576)281331979  |x 1932-6203  |7 nnas  |a German validation of three ethics questionnaires consequentialist scale, ethical standards of judgment questionnaire, and revised ethics position questionnaire 
773 1 8 |g volume:20  |g year:2025  |g number:5  |g elocationid:e0319937  |g pages:1-22  |g extent:22  |a German validation of three ethics questionnaires consequentialist scale, ethical standards of judgment questionnaire, and revised ethics position questionnaire 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0319937  |x Verlag  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0319937  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
992 |a 20251027 
993 |a Article 
994 |a 2025 
998 |g 1280837802  |a Melchior, Florian  |m 1280837802:Melchior, Florian  |p 2 
998 |g 120000989  |a Teichmann, Birgit  |m 120000989:Teichmann, Birgit  |d 850000  |d 851600  |e 850000PT120000989  |e 851600PT120000989  |k 0/850000/  |k 1/850000/851600/  |p 1  |x j 
999 |a KXP-PPN1939495253  |e 4791945956 
BIB |a Y 
SER |a journal 
JSO |a {"id":{"eki":["1939495253"],"doi":["10.1371/journal.pone.0319937"]},"note":["Gesehen am 27.10.2025"],"name":{"displayForm":["Birgit Teichmann, Florian Melchior, George Kosteletos"]},"language":["eng"],"recId":"1939495253","relHost":[{"language":["eng"],"name":{"displayForm":["Public Library of Science"]},"part":{"issue":"5","text":"20(2025), 5, Artikel-ID e0319937, Seite 1-22","pages":"1-22","year":"2025","volume":"20","extent":"22"},"pubHistory":["1.2006 -"],"title":[{"title":"PLOS ONE","title_sort":"PLOS ONE"}],"origin":[{"publisher":"PLOS ; PLoS","dateIssuedDisp":"2006-","dateIssuedKey":"2006","publisherPlace":"San Francisco, California, US ; Lawrence, Kan."}],"corporate":[{"display":"Public Library of Science","role":"isb","roleDisplay":"Herausgebendes Organ"}],"recId":"523574592","note":["Schreibweise des Titels bis 2012: PLoS ONE","Gesehen am 20.03.19"],"id":{"issn":["1932-6203"],"eki":["523574592"],"zdb":["2267670-3"]},"physDesc":[{"extent":"Online-Ressource"}],"disp":"German validation of three ethics questionnaires consequentialist scale, ethical standards of judgment questionnaire, and revised ethics position questionnairePLOS ONE","type":{"media":"Online-Ressource","bibl":"periodical"}}],"type":{"bibl":"article-journal","media":"Online-Ressource"},"origin":[{"dateIssuedKey":"2025","dateIssuedDisp":"May 2, 2025"}],"title":[{"title":"German validation of three ethics questionnaires","title_sort":"German validation of three ethics questionnaires","subtitle":"consequentialist scale, ethical standards of judgment questionnaire, and revised ethics position questionnaire"}],"person":[{"role":"aut","roleDisplay":"VerfasserIn","given":"Birgit","family":"Teichmann","display":"Teichmann, Birgit"},{"given":"Florian","roleDisplay":"VerfasserIn","role":"aut","family":"Melchior","display":"Melchior, Florian"},{"family":"Kosteletos","display":"Kosteletos, George","role":"aut","given":"George","roleDisplay":"VerfasserIn"}],"physDesc":[{"extent":"22 S.","noteIll":"Illustrationen"}]} 
SRT |a TEICHMANNBGERMANVALI2202