Selection by noncontrast computed tomography with or without computed tomography angiography versus computed tomography perfusion for endovascular therapy in patients with acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

Background - The effect of imaging selection on endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke remains debated. We compared the efficacy and safety of imaging modalities using computed tomography perfusion with using noncontrast computed tomography (NCCT)±computed tomography angiography. - Methods -...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhang, Yang (Author) , Zhao, Yang (Author) , Deng, Bowen (Author) , Wu, Simiao (Author) , Nogueira, Raul G. (Author) , Abdalkader, Mohamad (Author) , Nagel, Simon (Author) , Michel, Patrik (Author) , Qiu, Zhongming (Author) , Yang, Qingwu (Author) , Miao, Zhongrong (Author) , Huo, Xiaochuan (Author) , Sun, Dapeng (Author) , Sarraj, Amrou (Author) , Campbell, Bruce C. V. (Author) , Zhao, Chuansheng (Author) , Chen, Wenhuo (Author) , Yi, Tingyu (Author) , Bian, Wei (Author) , Nguyen, Thanh N. (Author) , Sui, Yi (Author) , Wang, Haiyuan (Author)
Format: Article (Journal)
Language:English
Published: June 17, 2025
In: Journal of the American Heart Association
Year: 2025, Volume: 14, Issue: 12, Pages: 1-12
ISSN:2047-9980
DOI:10.1161/JAHA.124.038173
Online Access:Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.124.038173
Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.124.038173
Get full text
Author Notes:Yang Zhang, MPH, Yang Zhao, MPH, Bowen Deng, MPH, Simiao Wu, MD, PhD, Raul G. Nogueira, MD, Mohamad Abdalkader, MD, Simon Nagel, MD, Patrik Michel, MD,Zhongming Qiu, MD, Qingwu Yang, MD, PhD, Zhongrong Miao, MD, PhD, Xiaochuan Huo, MD, PhD, Dapeng Sun, MD, Amrou Sarraj, MD, Bruce C.V. Campbell, MD, Chuansheng Zhao, MD, PhD, Wenhuo Chen, MD,Tingyu Yi, MD, Wei Bian, MD, Thanh N. Nguyen, MD, PhD, Yi Sui, MD, PhD, Haiyuan Wang, MD, PhD
Description
Summary:Background - The effect of imaging selection on endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke remains debated. We compared the efficacy and safety of imaging modalities using computed tomography perfusion with using noncontrast computed tomography (NCCT)±computed tomography angiography. - Methods - Studies from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to March 1, 2024, were analyzed. Sixteen studies (12 199 patients) assessed functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2 at 90 days) using odds ratios (ORs). This study was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42024519554). - Results - No significant differences were observed in functional independence (OR, 1.09 [95% CI, 0.98-1.21]), modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 1 (OR, 1.07 [95% CI, 0.88-1.29]), 0 to 3 (OR, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.92-1.18]), thrombolysis in cerebral infarction 2b to 3 (OR, 1.08 [95% CI, 0.95-1.22]), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (OR, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.74-1.04]), and any intracranial hemorrhage (OR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.80-1.12]) between the computed tomography perfusion and NCCT group. There was a significantly lower odds of death during follow‐up in the computed tomography perfusion group compared with the NCCT group (OR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.70-0.88]). Comparison of modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 2 significantly favored NCCT selection for patients with large cores (Pinteraction=0.05). Risk of bias assessment using the Cochrane risk assessment tool revealed concerns in 1 randomized control trial, while observational and post hoc studies assessed with Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions I showed moderate (2 studies), serious (11 studies), and critical (2 studies) risk of bias. - Conclusions - These findings indicate that patients undergoing endovascular therapy selected with computed tomography perfusion had a similar functional prognosis compared with those selected with NCCT but had lower odds of death during follow‐up. NCCT‐defined large‐core patients had better functional outcomes.
Item Description:Online veröffentlicht: 11. Juni 2025
Gesehen am 28.10.2025
Physical Description:Online Resource
ISSN:2047-9980
DOI:10.1161/JAHA.124.038173