Rethinking cancer of unknown primary: from diagnostic challenge to targeted treatment

Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is a metastatic malignancy for which a primary site of origin cannot be identified despite a thorough and standardized diagnostic work-up, and accounts for 1-3% of all malignancies. An unfavourable subgroup of CUP has a poor prognosis, with a median overall survival o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Pouyiourou, Maria (VerfasserIn) , Bochtler, Tilmann (VerfasserIn) , Pauli, Chantal (VerfasserIn) , Moch, Holger (VerfasserIn) , Brobeil, Alexander (VerfasserIn) , Pantel, Klaus (VerfasserIn) , Stenzinger, Albrecht (VerfasserIn) , Krämer, Alwin (VerfasserIn)
Dokumenttyp: Article (Journal)
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 04 August 2025
In: Nature reviews. Clinical oncology
Year: 2025, Jahrgang: 22, Heft: 10, Pages: 781-799
ISSN:1759-4782
DOI:10.1038/s41571-025-01060-8
Online-Zugang:Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-025-01060-8
Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41571-025-01060-8
Volltext
Verfasserangaben:Maria Pouyiourou, Tilmann Bochtler, Chantal Pauli, Holger Moch, Alexander Brobeil, Klaus Pantel, Albrecht Stenzinger, Alwin Krämer
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is a metastatic malignancy for which a primary site of origin cannot be identified despite a thorough and standardized diagnostic work-up, and accounts for 1-3% of all malignancies. An unfavourable subgroup of CUP has a poor prognosis, with a median overall survival of <1 year when treated with current standard-of-care platinum-based chemotherapy. Virtually no progress in elucidating the disease biology and improving outcomes for patients with unfavourable CUP has been made over the past several decades, including a failure of initial randomized clinical trials to demonstrate the superiority of tissue-of-origin (ToO) identification by gene-expression profiling and subsequent primary-site-directed treatment over standard chemotherapy. However, large-cohort randomized trials have now shown that molecularly guided therapy improves outcomes for patients with CUP harbouring an actionable target, both in a tissue-agnostic as well as a primary tumour site-specific context. Moreover, data from non-randomized phase II trials suggest that immunotherapy using immune-checkpoint inhibitors can be beneficial even in patients with CUP that has relapsed after, or is refractory to, standard chemotherapy. In addition, a plethora of refined and novel strategies, including DNA and RNA sequencing, DNA-methylation profiling, circulating tumour DNA analysis, and artificial intelligence-based pathology, have been leveraged to facilitate ToO identification. In light of these developments, we review current ToO methodologies and compare the evidence supporting the use of a primary tumour site-guided approach versus a histology-agnostic approach to the management of CUP. We also discuss whether CUP can be viewed as a model disease for the development of histology-agnostic precision oncology treatment strategies.
Beschreibung:Gesehen am 08.12.2025
Beschreibung:Online Resource
ISSN:1759-4782
DOI:10.1038/s41571-025-01060-8