Underconfidence and the low-experimentation trap

We study how confidence bias affects investment in learning via experimentation, a mechanism critical for technology adoption under uncertainty. We hypothesize that bias direction and strength predict how willingness to experiment diverges from unbiased agents. We measure revealed and stated demand...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Tyack, Nicholas (VerfasserIn) , Arouna, Aminou (VerfasserIn) , Dembélé, Urbain (VerfasserIn) , Goeschl, Timo (VerfasserIn)
Dokumenttyp: Book/Monograph Arbeitspapier
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: Heidelberg Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg 23 Jan. 2026
Heidelberg Heidelberg University, Department of Economics 23 Jan. 2026
Schriftenreihe:AWI discussion paper series no. 769 (Januar 2026)
In: AWI discussion paper series (no. 769 (Januar 2026))

DOI:10.11588/heidok.00037956
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Resolving-System, kostenfrei: https://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:16-heidok-379563
Resolving-System, kostenfrei: https://doi.org/10.11588/heidok.00037956
Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: http://www.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/archiv/37956
Verlag, kostenfrei: https://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/volltextserver/37956/7/Tyack_Underconfidence_dp769_2025.pdf
Volltext
Verfasserangaben:Nicholas Tyack, Aminou Arouna, Urbain Dembélé, Timo Goeschl
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We study how confidence bias affects investment in learning via experimentation, a mechanism critical for technology adoption under uncertainty. We hypothesize that bias direction and strength predict how willingness to experiment diverges from unbiased agents. We measure revealed and stated demand for experimenting with drought-resistant crop varieties of 1,957 farmers in West Africa, a climate change hotspot. Consistent with our hypothesis, confidence bias strongly predicts willingness to experiment. The effect, however, is driven exclusively by underconfident agents, among whom females are overrepresented. In deteriorating environments, this behavioral friction undercuts effective technology diffusion and risks trapping individuals in maladapted production environments.
Beschreibung:Online Resource
DOI:10.11588/heidok.00037956