How green are large language models for radiology report labelling?: comparing human, rule-based and hybrid workflows
To address limited quantitative data on sustainable use of large language models (LLMs) in radiology, we quantified the resource footprint of LLMs for labelling CT pulmonary embolism reports and assessed how a hybrid rule-based-LLM workflow changes time, cost and carbon emissions compared with manua...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article (Journal) |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
27 May 2026
|
| In: |
Insights into imaging
Year: 2026, Volume: 17, Issue: 1, Pages: 1-11 |
| ISSN: | 1869-4101 |
| DOI: | 10.1186/s13244-026-02289-2 |
| Online Access: | Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13244-026-02289-2 Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-026-02289-2 |
| Author Notes: | Matthias A. Fink, Arved Bischoff, Edem Atsiatorme, Alexander Kremer, Jonas Kroschke, Martin Moll, Patrick Stein, Veronika Riebl, Timo Leichenich, Hans-Ulrich Kauczor and Kai Schlamp |
| Summary: | To address limited quantitative data on sustainable use of large language models (LLMs) in radiology, we quantified the resource footprint of LLMs for labelling CT pulmonary embolism reports and assessed how a hybrid rule-based-LLM workflow changes time, cost and carbon emissions compared with manual labelling. |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | Gesehen am 26.08.2026 |
| Physical Description: | Online Resource |
| ISSN: | 1869-4101 |
| DOI: | 10.1186/s13244-026-02289-2 |