Are the treasures of game theory ambiguous?

Goeree & Holt (2001) observe that, for some parameter values, Nash equilibrium provides good predictions for actual behaviour in experiments. For other payoff parameters, however, actual behaviour deviates consistently from that predicted by Nash equilibria. They attribute the robust deviations...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eichberger, Jürgen (Author) , Kelsey, David (Author)
Format: Article (Journal) Book/Monograph Working Paper
Language:English
Published: Heidelberg University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics May 27, 2008
Edition:This version: May 27, 2008
Series:Discussion paper series / Universität Heidelberg, Department of Economics no. 469
In: Discussion paper series (no. 469)

Subjects:
Online Access:Resolving-System, Volltext: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/127283
Verlag, Volltext: http://www.awi.uni-heidelberg.de/with2/Discussion%20papers/papers/dp469.pdf
Get full text
Author Notes:Jürgen Eichberger and David Kelsey
Search Result 1

Are the treasures of game theory ambiguous? by Eichberger, Jürgen (Author) , Kelsey, David (Author) ,


Get full text
Article (Journal) Online Resource
Search Result 2

Are the treasures of game theory ambiguous? by Eichberger, Jürgen (Author)


Get full text
Article (Journal)
Search Result 3

Are the treasures of game theory ambiguous by Eichberger, Jürgen (Author)


Get full text
Article (Journal) Book/Monograph Working Paper