Self-regulation from a process perspective
The first aim of this study was to analyze self-regulation from a process perspective. Therefore, a process model of self-regulation (Schmitz & Wiese, 2006) was described, postulating state components of self-regulation in three learning phases. The relationships within the model were investigat...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article (Journal) |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2007
|
| In: |
Zeitschrift für Psychologie
Year: 2007, Volume: 215, Issue: 3, Pages: 194-204 |
| ISSN: | 2151-2604 |
| DOI: | 10.1027/0044-3409.215.3.194 |
| Online Access: | Verlag, Volltext: http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/0044-3409.215.3.194
|
| Author Notes: | Franziska Perels, Barbara Otto, Meike Landmann, Silke Hertel, Bernhard Schmitz |
| Summary: | The first aim of this study was to analyze self-regulation from a process perspective. Therefore, a process model of self-regulation (Schmitz & Wiese, 2006) was described, postulating state components of self-regulation in three learning phases. The relationships within the model were investigated by means of univariate and multivariate time-series analyses based on process data collected through learning diaries. The second aim was to evaluate an intervention study with 8th-grade students as an example for training evaluation based on process data. The whole sample consisted of 249 8th-grade students; for time-series analyses a subsample of 66 students was used. The results concerning the first research question support the conceptualization of the process model and underline the process character of self-regulation as well as the state conceptualization of the model. The training evaluation results show that specifying the results of standard evaluations by means of control group comparison with time-series methods is enriching. |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | Gesehen am 17.07.2017 |
| Physical Description: | Online Resource |
| ISSN: | 2151-2604 |
| DOI: | 10.1027/0044-3409.215.3.194 |