Cover Image

Functional midterm follow-up comparison of stemless total shoulder prostheses versus conventional stemmed anatomic shoulder prostheses using a 3D-motion-analysis

Show other versions (1)

The aim of this study is to compare the functional midterm outcome of stemless shoulder prostheses with standard anatomical stemmed shoulder prostheses and to show that the STEMLESS results are comparable to the STEMMED with respect to active maximum range of shoulder motion (ROM) and Constant score...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Spranz, David Maximilian (Author) , Wolf, Sebastian Immanuel (Author) , Zeifang, Felix (Author) , Maier, Michael Wolfgang (Author)
Format: Article (Journal)
Language:English
Published: 21 November 2017
In: BMC musculoskeletal disorders
Year: 2017, Volume: 18
ISSN:1471-2474
DOI:10.1186/s12891-017-1835-3
Online Access:Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1835-3
Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1835-3
Get full text
Author Notes:David M. Spranz, Hendrik Bruttel, Sebastian I. Wolf, Felix Zeifang and Michael W. Maier
Description
Summary:The aim of this study is to compare the functional midterm outcome of stemless shoulder prostheses with standard anatomical stemmed shoulder prostheses and to show that the STEMLESS results are comparable to the STEMMED with respect to active maximum range of shoulder motion (ROM) and Constant score (CS).
Item Description:Gesehen am 18.01.2018
Physical Description:Online Resource
ISSN:1471-2474
DOI:10.1186/s12891-017-1835-3

Similar Items