Open to feedback?: Formal and informal recursivity in creative commons’ transnational standard‐setting
In this article, we examine how non-membership organizations that claim stewardship over a transnational public or common good, such as the environmental or digital commons, develop combinations of formal and informal recursivity to develop and maintain regulatory conversations with their dispersed...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article (Journal) |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
11 September 2017
|
| In: |
Global policy
Year: 2017, Volume: 8, Issue: 3, Pages: 353-363 |
| ISSN: | 1758-5899 |
| DOI: | 10.1111/1758-5899.12462 |
| Online Access: | Verlag, Volltext: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12462 Verlag, Volltext: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1758-5899.12462 
|
| Author Notes: | Leonhard Dobusch, Markus Lang, Sigrid Quack |
| Summary: | In this article, we examine how non-membership organizations that claim stewardship over a transnational public or common good, such as the environmental or digital commons, develop combinations of formal and informal recursivity to develop and maintain regulatory conversations with their dispersed user communities. Based on a case study of Creative Commons, an organization that developed what have become the most widely used open licenses for digital content, we show how rhetorical openness to informal feedback from legitimacy communities in different sectors and countries can improve the feasibility and diffusion of standards. However, as long as the standard-setter's methods of making decisions on the basis of such feedback remains opaque, its communities are likely to raise accountability demands for more extensive ex post justifications. |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | Gesehen am 04.04.2018 |
| Physical Description: | Online Resource |
| ISSN: | 1758-5899 |
| DOI: | 10.1111/1758-5899.12462 |