Evaluation of third-generation ELISA and a rapid immunochromatographic assay for the detection of norovirus infection in fecal samples from inpatients of a German tertiary care hospital

The analytical accuracy of the RIDASCREEN Norovirus 3rd Generation ELISA assay and the rapid immunochromatographic RIDAQUICK Norovirus assay were determined in comparison to PCR. In a prospective study 410 consecutive samples were collected from inpatients of a tertiary care hospital in Germany. All...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Geginat, Gernot (Author) , Kaiser, Dominik (Author) , Schrempf, Sabrina (Author)
Format: Article (Journal)
Language:English
Published: 2012
In: European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases
Year: 2011, Volume: 31, Issue: 5, Pages: 733-737
ISSN:1435-4373
DOI:10.1007/s10096-011-1366-z
Online Access:Verlag, Volltext: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-011-1366-z
Verlag, Volltext: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10096-011-1366-z
Get full text
Author Notes:G. Geginat, D. Kaiser, S. Schrempf
Description
Summary:The analytical accuracy of the RIDASCREEN Norovirus 3rd Generation ELISA assay and the rapid immunochromatographic RIDAQUICK Norovirus assay were determined in comparison to PCR. In a prospective study 410 consecutive samples were collected from inpatients of a tertiary care hospital in Germany. All samples were tested with the two antigen detection assays, as well as with three different real-time reverse transcription PCR methods as the reference standard. A sample was considered true-positive if at least 2 out of 3 PCR methods yielded a positive signal (137 positive samples, >99% genogroup II). Compared with the PCR-based reference the overall diagnostic sensitivities of the ELISA and the immunochromatographic assay were 77% and 69% and the diagnostic specificities were 96% and 97% respectively. Both assays allow the rapid and economic screening of large numbers of samples and thus are useful diagnostic tools for the detection of suspected norovirus infections.
Item Description:Published online: 02 August 2011
Gesehen am 25.04.2018
Physical Description:Online Resource
ISSN:1435-4373
DOI:10.1007/s10096-011-1366-z